TO COMPARE CLINICAL VERSUS ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT OF CORRECT PLACEMENT OF PROSEAL LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED STUDY
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 进行中（未招募）
- 发起方
- AIIMS
- 入组人数
- 200
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To evaluate the use of ultrasonography as a suitable alternative to clinical assessment of PLMA for its accurate placement in patients.
研究概览
简要总结
we will conduct this study with an aim to evaluateclinical usefulness of the ultrasonographic assessment of confirmation of PLMAplacement as compared to the classical clinical testsafter placement. this study will be done on patients undergoing surgery in our hospital where LMA placement is feasible. we have two groups, first group where position of Proseal LMA will be confirmed by clinical methods and second group where position will be confirmed by USG, then they will be assessed by Fibreoptic Bronchoscopy for its optimal placement. Then we will compare the two techniques.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Computer generated randomization
- 盲法
- Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 65.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •All patients of age 18- 65 years of age undergoing onco- surgery requiring general anaesthesia and supraglottic airway device (Proseal Laryngeal mask Airway, PLMA) as an airway management device will be recruited under this study.
排除标准
- •1.Unwilling patients.
- •2.Patients with unfavourable airway anatomy like patient undergoing head and neck surgeries precluding use of supraglottic airway device.
- •3.Patients at high risk of aspiration like bowel obstruction, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD).
结局指标
主要结局
To evaluate the use of ultrasonography as a suitable alternative to clinical assessment of PLMA for its accurate placement in patients.
时间窗: AFTER PLACEMENT OF PROSEAL LMA
次要结局
- 2. Malposition of PLMA at the end of procedure after positive pressure ventilation.
- 1.Time taken for assessment for the correct placement of PLMA by clinical methods and ultrasonography (USG).