Comparing Efficacy Between Anti-microtubule and Non-anti-microtubule as 3th Therapy After 2nd Line EGFR-TKI Therapy
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- AstraZeneca
- Enrollment
- 36
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- PFS of the third-line therapy
Study Overview
Brief Summary
This is an observational prospective study that investigates only daily practice. The prescription of anti-cancer medicine is separated from the decision to include the patient in this study. In addition, the assignment of the patient to a particular therapy or therapeutic strategy is not decided in advance by this study protocol, but falls within current practice.
The patient who fulfils eligible criteria will be enrolled when starts to receive the second-line EGFR-TKI therapy. The frequency of tumor response evaluation by RECIST criteria follows the investigator's discretion as daily practice.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Time Perspective
- Prospective
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 20 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •At least one measurable lesion according to RECIST criteria
- •Histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC of adeno histology
- •Locally progressed or metastasized on or after first-line chemotherapy. The imaging evidence of disease progression can be either chest X ray, CT or MRI assessment on measurable lesions. If no measurable lesion is available, evaluable lesions are acce
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
PFS of the third-line therapy
Time Frame: 9 months
Secondary Outcomes
- Overall objective tumor response (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) of the third-line therapy by RECIST criteria(9 months)
