跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01815268
NCT01815268Unknown4 期

High Dose Influenza Vaccination and Morbidity & Mortality in U.S. Nursing Homes

Insight Therapeutics, LLC6 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 823 人开始时间: 2013年2月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
4 期
入组人数
823
试验地点
6
主要终点
Hospitalization rate

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate relative effectiveness of high dose influenza vaccine in preventing influenza mortality, hospitalization, and functional decline in a nursing home population in the U.S., compared to the standard dose trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine.

详细描述

SUMMARY: This nationally representative study samples from estimated 6782 Medicare-certified nursing homes co-located within 50 miles of the 122 cities reporting to Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) weekly influenza surveillance. In total, 1000 facilities will be enrolled for random assignment to either: 1) the licensed high dose (HD) trivalent influenza vaccine (High-Dose Fluzone [HD vaccine]), or 2) the standard dose (SD) trivalent influenza vaccine (Fluzone [SD vaccine]) for their residents. Additionally, half the facilities will receive free SD vaccine for their staff and the remaining facilities will practice usual care (no free vaccine) for staff.

BACKGROUND: Influenza and pneumonia (P&I) are leading infectious causes of hospitalization and mortality in community-dwelling older adults and residents of long-term custodial care facilities or nursing homes (NH), and produce substantial annual health care costs. The elderly incur over 90% of this disease burden and NH residents are especially vulnerable given immune senescence, multimorbidity, and close living quarters. While hospitalization rates for NH residents vary considerably between facilities, most occur during the sixteen weeks of peak influenza activity annually. Influenza vaccination, a mainstay in prevention, is recommended in the U.S. for all individuals six months of age and older. Vaccination associates with reduced rates of stroke, heart attack, hospitalization, and death in non-institutional older adult populations. However, the benefit of influenza vaccine for the elderly in general has been questioned, a salient concern for frail elderly, such as NH residents. Influenza vaccination rates vary substantially between nursing homes. Influenza vaccine response declines with advancing age, indicating the need for a better vaccine.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective is to estimate the differences in all-cause hospitalization rates during influenza season experienced by long-stay nursing home residents, between facilities using HD vaccine vs. SD vaccine. The secondary objective is to estimate the differences in the likelihood of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) functional decline and mortality rates in the study nursing homes.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
65 Years 至 —(Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Long-term care facilities within 50 miles of one of the 122 cities that serve as CDC surveillance sites

排除标准

  • Facilities already systematically administering HD vaccine to their residents
  • Facilities having fewer than 50 long-stay residents
  • Hospital-based facilities
  • Facilities with more than 20% of the population under age 65
  • Facilities not submitting Minimum Data Set (MDS) data

研究组 & 干预措施

SD Vaccine (Residents) + Usual Care (Staff)

Active Comparator

NH facilities randomized to receive standard dose influenza vaccine (Fluzone) for the residents and not provided free vaccine for the staff.

干预措施: SD Vaccine (Biological)

SD Vaccine (Residents) + Usual Care (Staff)

Active Comparator

NH facilities randomized to receive standard dose influenza vaccine (Fluzone) for the residents and not provided free vaccine for the staff.

干预措施: Usual Care (Biological)

HD Vaccine (Residents) + Free Vaccine (Staff)

Experimental

NH facilities randomized to receive high-dose trivalent influenza vaccine (Fluzone High-Dose) for the residents and provided free SD vaccine (Fluzone) for the staff.

干预措施: HD Vaccine (Biological)

HD Vaccine (Residents) + Free Vaccine (Staff)

Experimental

NH facilities randomized to receive high-dose trivalent influenza vaccine (Fluzone High-Dose) for the residents and provided free SD vaccine (Fluzone) for the staff.

干预措施: Free Vaccine (Biological)

HD Vaccine (Residents) + Usual Care (Staff)

Experimental

NH facilities randomized to receive high-dose trivalent influenza vaccine (Fluzone High-Dose) for the residents and not provided free vaccine for the staff.

干预措施: HD Vaccine (Biological)

HD Vaccine (Residents) + Usual Care (Staff)

Experimental

NH facilities randomized to receive high-dose trivalent influenza vaccine (Fluzone High-Dose) for the residents and not provided free vaccine for the staff.

干预措施: Usual Care (Biological)

SD Vaccine (Residents) + Free Vaccine (Staff)

Active Comparator

NH facilities randomized to receive standard dose influenza vaccine (Fluzone) for the residents and provided free standard dose vaccine (Fluzone) for the staff.

干预措施: SD Vaccine (Biological)

SD Vaccine (Residents) + Free Vaccine (Staff)

Active Comparator

NH facilities randomized to receive standard dose influenza vaccine (Fluzone) for the residents and provided free standard dose vaccine (Fluzone) for the staff.

干预措施: Free Vaccine (Biological)

结局指标

主要结局

Hospitalization rate

时间窗: up to 1 year

次要结局

  • Facility-level mortality rate(up to 1 year)
  • Effect of facility policies on staff vaccination rates(up to 3 years)
  • Change in activities of daily living (ADL) scores(up to 1 year)
  • Hospitalization rate based on vaccine type and influenza strain(Up to 3 years)
  • Cost difference between vaccine types(up to 3 years)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (6)

Loading locations...

相似试验