MedPath

Reliability of Subcutaneous Echogenicity (SEG) Grade and Subcutaneous Echo-free Space (SEFS) Grade

Completed
Conditions
Postmastectomy Lymphedema Syndrome
Interventions
Diagnostic Test: Ultrasonographic assessment of postmastectomy lymphedema
Registration Number
NCT03559296
Lead Sponsor
Marmara University
Brief Summary

The aims of this study is to determine the inter- and intra-rater reliability of SEG and SEFS grade systems for postmastectomy lymphedema.

Detailed Description

The clinical severity of lymphedema in an extremity is generally graded according to the International Society of Lymphology (ISL) stage. Stage 0 which refers to a latent or subclinical condition where swelling is not evident despite impaired lymph transport. It may exist months or years before overt edema occurs (Stages I-III). Stage I represents an early accumulation of fluid relatively high in protein content (e.g., in comparison with "venous" edema) and subsides with limb elevation. Pitting may occur. Stage II signifies that limb elevation alone rarely reduces tissue swelling and pitting is manifest. Late in Stage II, the limb may or may not pit as tissue fibrosis supervenes. Stage III encompasses lymphostatic elephantiasis where pitting is absent and trophic skin changes such as acanthosis, fat deposits, and warty overgrowths develop. Within each Stage, severity based on volume difference can be assessed as minimal (\<20% increase) in limb volume, moderate (20-40% increase), or severe (\>40% increase).

Because the ISL stage mainly consists of findings achieved by physical examinations and represents the most severely affected arm, it is subjective and may not reflect the distribution and mode of progression of the disease. The characteristic skin and subcutaneous tissue changes in extremities with chronic lymphedema are caused by changes in the extracellular matrix, such as connective tissue hypertrophy, fat accumulation resulting from both fat hypertrophy and an increased number of adipocytes, and interstitial protein-rich fluid accumulation. Ultrasound has been used to assess and diagnose lymphedema related changes. Subcutaneous echogenicity (SEG) and subcutaneous echo-free space (SEFS) grade systems for postmastectomy lymphedema are developed in order to grade lymphedema objectively and to delineate the disease status more clearly. However, the reliability of SEG and SEFS has not been evaluated. The aims of this study is to determine the inter- and intra-rater reliability of SEG and SEFS grade systems for postmastectomy lymphedema. Two physiatrist (one ten-year-experienced and one five-year-experienced in musculoskeletal ultrasonography) independently and alternately will assess the subjects once for each assessment. Three days later after the initial examination, one of the physiatrists reassessed the patients. The inter- and intra-rater reliability will be determined using kappa.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Patients with unilateral postmastectomy lymphedema
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Bilateral lymphedema
  2. The patients who had known systemic edemagenic conditions (e.g., cardiac/hepatic/renal failure, terminal cancer, on chemotherapy), and/or with cancer recurrence were excluded

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Study GroupUltrasonographic assessment of postmastectomy lymphedemapatients with postmastectomy lymphedema who will undergo ultrasonographic assessment of postmastectomy lymphedema and circumferential tape measurement of arm
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
International Society of Lymphology (ISL) stage by rater 2Day 0

stage of the clinical severity of lymphedema

International Society of Lymphology (ISL) stage by rater 1Day 3

stage of the clinical severity of lymphedema

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
MCP joint level affected armDay 0

The circumferential measurement of affected arm at the metacarpophalangeal joints (MCP)

elbow joint point affected armDay 0

The circumferential measurement of affected arm at the elbow joint point

15 cm above the elbow joint point affected armDay 0

The circumferential measurement of affected arm at 15 cm above the elbow joint point

15 cm above the elbow joint point unaffected armDay 0

The circumferential measurement of affected arm at 15 cm above the elbow joint point

MCP joint level unaffected armDay 0

The circumferential measurement of affected arm at the MCP joints

15 cm below the elbow joint point unaffected armDay 0

The circumferential measurement of affected arm at 15 cm below the elbow joint point

Affected extremity volume (mL)Day 0

Lymphedema of the limbs were assessed by a single physiotherapist using the circumferential and volumetric methods before and after the treatment protocol. The circumferential upper limb measurements were carried out with the arm abducted at 30°, starting at the level of the carpometacarpal joint, every 5 cm proximal to this point along both limbs. Then, a computer program (limb volumes professional version 5.0) was used to convert these values into limb volumes in milliliters.

Unaffected extremity volume (mL)Day 0

Lymphedema of the limbs were assessed by a single physiotherapist using the circumferential and volumetric methods before and after the treatment protocol. The circumferential upper limb measurements were carried out with the arm abducted at 30°, starting at the level of the carpometacarpal joint, every 5 cm proximal to this point along both limbs. Then, a computer program (limb volumes professional version 5.0) was used to convert these values into limb volumes in milliliters.

Subcutaneous echo-free space (SEFS) grade by rater 1Day 3

Grade 0: No SEFS. Grade 1: Horizontally oriented (\<45 degrees to the skin) SEFS only. Grade 2: Presence of vertically oriented (≥45 degrees to the skin) SEFS bridging the horizontally oriented SEFSs.

wrist joint level affected armDay 0

The circumferential measurement of affected arm at wrist joint

wrist joint level unaffected armDay 0

The circumferential measurement of affected arm at wrist joint

15 cm below the elbow joint point affected armDay 0

The circumferential measurement of affected arm at 15 cm below the elbow joint point

elbow joint point unaffected armDay 0

The circumferential measurement of unaffected arm at the elbow joint point

Subcutaneous echogenicity (SEG) grade by rater 1Day 3

Grade 0: No increase in echogenicity in the subcutaneous layer. Namely, the subcutaneous fat layer is observed as black. Grade 1: Diffuse increase in echogenicity, but identifiable horizontal or obliquely oriented echogenic lines caused by connective tissue bundles. Grade 2: Diffuse increase in echogenicity. Echogenic lines are not identifiable

Subcutaneous echogenicity (SEG) grade by rater 2Day 0

Grade 0: No increase in echogenicity in the subcutaneous layer. Namely, the subcutaneous fat layer is observed as black. Grade 1: Diffuse increase in echogenicity, but identifiable horizontal or obliquely oriented echogenic lines caused by connective tissue bundles. Grade 2: Diffuse increase in echogenicity. Echogenic lines are not identifiable

Subcutaneous echo-free space (SEFS) grade by rater 2Day 0

Grade 0: No SEFS. Grade 1: Horizontally oriented (\<45 degrees to the skin) SEFS only. Grade 2: Presence of vertically oriented (≥45 degrees to the skin) SEFS bridging the horizontally oriented SEFSs.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Marmara University School of Medicine Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

🇹🇷

Istanbul, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath