Comparison of intubating devices in adult patients(Tuoren Video Laryngoscope,Airtraq AND Macintosh Laryngoscope)
Phase 1
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: Z00-Z13- Persons encountering health services for examinationsHealth Condition 2: Z768- Persons encountering health services in other specified circumstances
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/10/016006
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
ASA Grade I and II patients
Age between 20-65 years
Weight between 40-75kg
Patients of both sexes
Patients planned for elective surgery
All classes of MP grades
Exclusion Criteria
Previous history of multiple /failed intubation
Predicted difficult laryngoscopy
Any pathology of the oral cavity that may obstruct the insertion of device
Mouth opening less than 2.5cm
Potentially full stomach patients (trauma,morbid obesity,pregnancy,history of gastric regurgitation and heart burn)and at risk of oesophageal reflux (hiatus hernia)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the number of attempts required for successful intubationsTimepoint: 1 year
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method aryngoscopy and intubation time <br/ ><br>Ease of tracheal intubation Glottic view using Cormack and Lehane Grading <br/ ><br>Adjustment maneuvers required for successful intubation <br/ ><br>Changes in heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure during laryngoscopy and intubation <br/ ><br>Any trauma during laryngoscopy and intubation <br/ ><br>Postoperative sore throat within 24 hrsTimepoint: 1 year