The Effect of Intraperitoneal Nebulization: Ropivacaine vs Lignocaine in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Not Applicable
Recruiting
- Conditions
- The Effect of Intraperitoneal Nebulization: Ropivacaine vs Lignocaine in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000016797
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Anaesthesiology MKCG Medical College
- Brief Summary
Intraperitoneal instillation of local an-aesthetic is an easy, cheap, and non-invasive method which provides better perioperative hemodynamic control along with good analgesia in the immediate postoperative period after laparoscopic surgery
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
1.Pre-op pain other than biliary colic 2.Chronic pain t/t or anti-epileptic therapy 3.H/O alcohol or drug addiction 4.Severe hepatic or renal impairment
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional,observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method We conclude that intraperitoneal instillation of local an-aesthetic is an easy, cheap, and non-invasive method which provides better perioperative hemodynamic control along with good analgesia in the immediate postoperative period after laparoscopic surgery. This effect evaluated better with Lignocaine as compared to Ropivacaine. So Lignocaine can be used as a low cost alternative.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The chief limitation of the study is poor visualization of the surgical field for the first few minutes which may delay the surgical procedure