Comparison of Conventional and Ultrasound Guided Techniques of Radial Artery Cannulation in Different Hemodynamic Subsets: a Randomized Controlled Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 100
- 主要终点
- First pass success rate
研究概览
简要总结
Purpose Two techniques of radial artery cannulation, ultrasound guided (USG) and conventional method (CM) were compared to find the better technique in general and in different hemodynamic subsets of patients.
Method This is a prospective randomized, single center study of 100 patients. The details of the primary cannulation technique, number of attempts, time taken, failure and cross-over technique were recorded for three different hemodynamic subsets with Systolic blood pressure <80 mm hg, 80-100 mm hg and > 100 mm hg.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 13 Years 至 90 Years（Child, Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •All adult Patients worthy of radial artery cannulation, who consented
排除标准
- •No consent
研究组 & 干预措施
Conventional method (CM)
Radial artery cannulation has been done using the conventional method. Cannulation failure with this technique were tried with USG technique secondarily.
干预措施: Radial artery cannulation (Procedure)
Ultrasound guided method (USG)
Radial artery cannulation is done with ultrasound guidance for this group of patients. Cannulation failure with this technique were tried with Conventional technique secondarily.
干预措施: Radial artery cannulation (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
First pass success rate
时间窗: 1 year
First pass success rate depicted the better method of cannulation of radial artery
Final/ultimate success rate of an intervention
时间窗: 1 year
If the primary technique failed then the cannulation was done with the secondary technique and hence the final success rate was calculated for each of the techniques: conventional and ultrasound guided.
次要结局
- Time taken for the respective technique(1 year)
- Attempts of cannulation(1 year)