跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01690416
NCT01690416已完成不适用

Conventional vs Ultrasound Guided Arteria Cannulation

Aarhus University Hospital Skejby2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 40 人开始时间: 2012年9月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
40
试验地点
2
主要终点
Withdrawals

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of the project is to compare two methods for arterial cannulation. The traditional method with ultrasound guided cannulation. The investigators goal is to improve this procedure to reduce pain and complications.

详细描述

The practice of placing vascular catheters is used many times every day at almost every hospital. It is a safe procedure which generally does not imply problems. Though the procedural optimum aren't reached. The procedure still fails some times and induce complications. When the catheter is placed using the traditional method the pulse is palpated by the operator's fingers. This is only to be done near the hand wrist. In this position the catheter steadiness is fragile but because the pulse can't be sensed more proximal the operator is forced to choose this position. This it though a problem that can be solved by non invasive visualization technology. Ultrasound-guidance for central vascular access is already well-established. However, in recent years ultrasound-guidance for peripheral vascular access has gained popularity too. The evidence of multiple studies demonstrates increased success rate and reduced complication rate with ultrasound compared to blind landmark technique for vascular catheter placement.

In recent years there have been both procedural technique and technology improvements in the field of ultrasound. This has led to the improvement of procedural catheterisation techniques that now can be done by novices with higher attempt success rate than traditional method. One technique that is gaining success is the short-axis-out-of-plane technique (SAX-OOP) with dynamic-needle-tip-tracking (DNTT).Using the ultrasound machine the needle can be placed in a more proximal direction on the forearm and the investigators believe that by the help of the exposed procedure on the monitor many complications can be reduced.

It has been shown that inexperienced trainees lear the technique SAX-OOP and DNTT very quickly.

First investigators hypothesize that the number of attempts, the number of withdrawals, the time spend and the number of utilized catheters will be decreased using ultrasound vs. the traditional method. Secondly investigators hypothesize that the pain induced by the conventional method inclusive preoperational lidocaine injection will be the same or more intense than using DNTT with local anesthesia. Thirdly investigators claim that the best anatomical place to put the catheter isn't always corresponding with the spot chosen by palpation, which increase the number of failures. Fourthly investigators hypothesize that the use of ultrasound will increase the operator's subjective feeling of having accomplished a successful procedure.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 90 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age 20-90 years
  • Fulfill the criteria of an operation
  • Routine need of an arterial needle

排除标准

  • Lack of patient consent
  • Ultrasound identified plaques in the radial artery or ultrasound verified compromised flow in either the radial or ulnar artery.

结局指标

主要结局

Withdrawals

时间窗: 1 hour

The number of withdrawals of the guide-needle per catheterization

Attempts

时间窗: 1 hour

The number of attempts (skin punctures) per catheterization

Time consume

时间窗: minutes

The time spend for the catheterization procedure

Catheters

时间窗: 1 hour

The number of utilized catheters

次要结局

  • pain(momentan)
  • Ease of method for the operator(momentan)

研究者

发起方
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Marlene A Hansen, Stud.med

Stud.med

Aarhus University Hospital Skejby

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Conventional vs Ultrasound Guided Arteria... | 临床试验