MedPath

Effects of Anesthetics and Surgery on Sleep Quality in Patients Undergoing Posterior Spinal Instrumentation Surgery

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Sleep Disturbance
Anesthesia; Adverse Effect
Interventions
Procedure: Propofol (Propofol-PF® 1% (Polifarma Pharmaceuticals, Tekirdag, Turkey)
Procedure: Sevoflurane (Sevorane® liquid 100%, Abbvie Pharmaceuticals, Istanbul, Turkey)
Registration Number
NCT06523881
Lead Sponsor
Uludag University
Brief Summary

Investigators aimed to evaluate the impact of the anesthesia method and surgical procedure on the sleep patterns and sleep quality of patients undergoing posterior spinal instrumentation using the Pittsburgh Insomnia Rating Scale-20 (PIRS-20).

Detailed Description

A total of 40 participants ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) I-III aged 18 and over who underwent elective spinal posterior instrumentation was included. The participants were divided into two groups randomly - those with sevoflurane and remifentanil anesthesia and those with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) - using the closed envelope method. Participants were evaluated before and after the surgery with the PIRS-20 (surgery one month previously and postoperative 7th day) for sleep quality, VAS (Visual Analogue Scale; recorded preoperative night and postoperative first hour), pain, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for anxiety (recorded preoperative night and postoperative 7th day) scores.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) I-III
  • Aged 18 and over
  • Who underwent elective spinal posterior instrumentation
Exclusion Criteria
  • Aged 17 and under
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) IV
  • Presence of psychological illness
  • Presence of psychological illness
  • Presence of sleep disorder

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group PPropofol (Propofol-PF® 1% (Polifarma Pharmaceuticals, Tekirdag, Turkey)Group P received propofol Propofol (Propofol-PF® 1% (Polifarma Pharmaceuticals, Tekirdag, Turkey) at a dosage of 75-100 µg/kg/min and remifentanil (Opiva vial®, Tum Ekip Pharmaceuticals Inc., Istanbul, Turkey) IV at a dosage of 0.05-0.2 µg/kg/min.
Group SSevoflurane (Sevorane® liquid 100%, Abbvie Pharmaceuticals, Istanbul, Turkey)Group S utilized sevoflurane (Sevorane® liquid 100%, Abbvie Pharmaceuticals, Istanbul, Turkey) for anesthesia maintenance, with an end-tidal sevoflurane concentration ranging from 1 to 1.5 minimal alveolar concentrations. Furthermore, remifentanil (Opiva vial®, Tum Ekip Pharmaceuticals Inc., Istanbul, Turkey) was administered IV at an infusion rate ranging from 0.05 to 0.2 µg kg/min.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Visual Analogue ScalePostoperative first hour

Pain score: Minimum value:0 Maximum value:10 Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

State-Trait Anxiety InventoryPostoperative seventh day

Anxiety score: Minimum value:20 Maximum value:80 Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Pittsburgh Insomnia Rating Scale-20Postoperative seventh day

Sleep score: Minimum value:0 Maximum value:60 Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Uludag University

🇹🇷

Bursa, Nilufer, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath