MedPath

Bandage Lenses in Treating Patients With Ocular Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Phase 2
Completed
Conditions
Graft Versus Host Disease
Ophthalmologic Complications
Interventions
Biological: graft versus host disease prophylaxis/therapy
Other: questionnaire administration
Procedure: optical coherence tomography
Registration Number
NCT01616056
Lead Sponsor
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Brief Summary

This phase II clinical trial studies how well bandage lenses work in treating patients with ocular graft versus host disease. Bandage lenses may be helpful in relieving eye symptoms and damage caused by eye graft versus host disease.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the symptom improvement after 2 weeks of therapy with bandage lenses.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To confirm short-term safety within 1 month after bandage lenses.

II. To determine improvement in ophthalmologic examinations after bandage lenses.

III. To explore the use of optical coherence tomography as an objective measure of corneal inflammation.

OUTLINE:

Patients wear bandage lenses continuously for at least 3 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosis of chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) as defined by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria

  • Ocular symptoms of NIH eye score 2 or greater:

    • Score 2: Moderate dry eye symptoms partially affecting activities of daily living (ADL) (requiring drops > 3 x per day or punctal plugs), WITHOUT vision impairment
    • Score 3: Severe dry eye symptoms significantly affecting ADL (special eyewear to relieve pain) OR unable to work because of ocular symptoms OR loss of vision caused by keratoconjunctivitis
  • No new systemic immunosuppressive medications within 1 month prior to enrollment

  • Subject has the ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria
  • Absolute neutrophil count < 1000/ul
  • Known hypersensitivity or allergy to contact lenses
  • Evidence of any active viral, bacterial, or fungal infection in the eyes that is progressive despite appropriate treatment
  • Treatment with contact lenses within the previous 3 months for any indication
  • Active psychiatric disorder, substance abuse or any other reason that would interfere with compliance with the study protocol

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Bandage Contact Lensesquestionnaire administrationPatients wear bandage lenses continuously for at least 3 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Bandage Contact Lensesgraft versus host disease prophylaxis/therapyPatients wear bandage lenses continuously for at least 3 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Bandage Contact Lensesoptical coherence tomographyPatients wear bandage lenses continuously for at least 3 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Patient-reported Symptoms as Measured by the 11-point Eye Rating Scale3 months

The 11-point eye scale goes from 0 not present to 10 as bad as you can imagine. Clinically meaningful change is defined as a 2 point or more decrease.

Change in Patient-reported Symptoms Measured by the 8-point Lee Eye Subscale3 months

Lee eye subscale: sx6 dry eyes, sx7 need to use eye drops frequently, sx8 difficulty seeing clearly 0=not at all, 4=extremely bothered. If have at least one of (sx6,sx7,sx8), then sx_eye=mean(sx6,sx7,sx8)\*25. Minimum possible score: 0 correlated with better outcome, maximum score possible: 100 correlated with worse outcome. Clinically meaningful change is half a standard deviation, which is a decrease of 11.8 of more for this scale.

Number of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the OSDI3 months

OSDI minimum score: 0, correlated with better outcome, maximum score: 100, correlated with worse outcome. 12 questions 0 none of the time to 4 all of the time. (Sum of scores)x25/number of questions answered. Clinically meaningful change scores are half a standard deviation, which is 10.9 for the OSDI.

Number of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the 8-level Lee Eye Symptom Subscale3 months

8-level change score is from 0 completely gone to 7 very much worse. Clinically meaningful improvement is defined as half a standard deviation (decreased score of 11.8 or greater).

Change in Patient-reported Symptoms as Measured by the Ocular Surface Disease Index3 months

OSDI minimum score: 0, correlated with better outcome, maximum score: 100, correlated with worse outcome. 12 questions 0 none of the time to 4 all of the time. (Sum of scores)x25/number of questions answered. Clinically meaningful change scores are half a standard deviation, which is 10.9 for the OSDI.

Number of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the 11-point Eye Scale3 months

The 11-point eye scale goes from 0 not present to 10 as bad as you can imagine. Clinically meaningful change is defined as a 2 point or more decrease.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Patients Who Experienced Serious Adverse Events1 month

Safety of Bandage Contact Lenses at 1 month

Change in Optical Coherence Tomography2 weeks

Patients were assessed by ophthalmologists at enrollment, 2 weeks and afterwards as medical needed.

Change in Comprehensive Ophthalmologic Evaluations2 weeks

LogMAR visual acuity score of 0 is equivalent to 20/20 vision. Patients were assessed by ophthalmologists at enrollment, 2 weeks and afterwards as medical needed.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

🇺🇸

Seattle, Washington, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath