Bandage Lenses in Treating Patients With Ocular Graft-Versus-Host Disease
- Conditions
- Graft Versus Host DiseaseOphthalmologic Complications
- Interventions
- Biological: graft versus host disease prophylaxis/therapyOther: questionnaire administrationProcedure: optical coherence tomography
- Registration Number
- NCT01616056
- Lead Sponsor
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
- Brief Summary
This phase II clinical trial studies how well bandage lenses work in treating patients with ocular graft versus host disease. Bandage lenses may be helpful in relieving eye symptoms and damage caused by eye graft versus host disease.
- Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the symptom improvement after 2 weeks of therapy with bandage lenses.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To confirm short-term safety within 1 month after bandage lenses.
II. To determine improvement in ophthalmologic examinations after bandage lenses.
III. To explore the use of optical coherence tomography as an objective measure of corneal inflammation.
OUTLINE:
Patients wear bandage lenses continuously for at least 3 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
-
Diagnosis of chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) as defined by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria
-
Ocular symptoms of NIH eye score 2 or greater:
- Score 2: Moderate dry eye symptoms partially affecting activities of daily living (ADL) (requiring drops > 3 x per day or punctal plugs), WITHOUT vision impairment
- Score 3: Severe dry eye symptoms significantly affecting ADL (special eyewear to relieve pain) OR unable to work because of ocular symptoms OR loss of vision caused by keratoconjunctivitis
-
No new systemic immunosuppressive medications within 1 month prior to enrollment
-
Subject has the ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent document
- Absolute neutrophil count < 1000/ul
- Known hypersensitivity or allergy to contact lenses
- Evidence of any active viral, bacterial, or fungal infection in the eyes that is progressive despite appropriate treatment
- Treatment with contact lenses within the previous 3 months for any indication
- Active psychiatric disorder, substance abuse or any other reason that would interfere with compliance with the study protocol
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Bandage Contact Lenses questionnaire administration Patients wear bandage lenses continuously for at least 3 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bandage Contact Lenses graft versus host disease prophylaxis/therapy Patients wear bandage lenses continuously for at least 3 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bandage Contact Lenses optical coherence tomography Patients wear bandage lenses continuously for at least 3 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Patient-reported Symptoms as Measured by the 11-point Eye Rating Scale 3 months The 11-point eye scale goes from 0 not present to 10 as bad as you can imagine. Clinically meaningful change is defined as a 2 point or more decrease.
Change in Patient-reported Symptoms Measured by the 8-point Lee Eye Subscale 3 months Lee eye subscale: sx6 dry eyes, sx7 need to use eye drops frequently, sx8 difficulty seeing clearly 0=not at all, 4=extremely bothered. If have at least one of (sx6,sx7,sx8), then sx_eye=mean(sx6,sx7,sx8)\*25. Minimum possible score: 0 correlated with better outcome, maximum score possible: 100 correlated with worse outcome. Clinically meaningful change is half a standard deviation, which is a decrease of 11.8 of more for this scale.
Number of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the OSDI 3 months OSDI minimum score: 0, correlated with better outcome, maximum score: 100, correlated with worse outcome. 12 questions 0 none of the time to 4 all of the time. (Sum of scores)x25/number of questions answered. Clinically meaningful change scores are half a standard deviation, which is 10.9 for the OSDI.
Number of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the 8-level Lee Eye Symptom Subscale 3 months 8-level change score is from 0 completely gone to 7 very much worse. Clinically meaningful improvement is defined as half a standard deviation (decreased score of 11.8 or greater).
Change in Patient-reported Symptoms as Measured by the Ocular Surface Disease Index 3 months OSDI minimum score: 0, correlated with better outcome, maximum score: 100, correlated with worse outcome. 12 questions 0 none of the time to 4 all of the time. (Sum of scores)x25/number of questions answered. Clinically meaningful change scores are half a standard deviation, which is 10.9 for the OSDI.
Number of Participants Who Perceived a Clinically Meaningful Change as Measured by the 11-point Eye Scale 3 months The 11-point eye scale goes from 0 not present to 10 as bad as you can imagine. Clinically meaningful change is defined as a 2 point or more decrease.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Patients Who Experienced Serious Adverse Events 1 month Safety of Bandage Contact Lenses at 1 month
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography 2 weeks Patients were assessed by ophthalmologists at enrollment, 2 weeks and afterwards as medical needed.
Change in Comprehensive Ophthalmologic Evaluations 2 weeks LogMAR visual acuity score of 0 is equivalent to 20/20 vision. Patients were assessed by ophthalmologists at enrollment, 2 weeks and afterwards as medical needed.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
🇺🇸Seattle, Washington, United States