Comparison of stomach expansion volume after two different airway devices.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: R688- Other general symptoms and signs
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2019/02/017753
- Lead Sponsor
- JIPMER
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
ASA-PS classification 1-2 patients scheduled for surgery under b 2-4 hours ofgeneral anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
ï?§Patient refusal
ï?§Potentially full stomach patients, requiring RSI
ï?§Obese patients with BMI > 30 kg/m2
ï?§Patients with upper gastrointestinal diseases, GERD
ï?§Upper gastro intestinal surgery
ï?§Patients with anticipated difficult mask ventilation or intubation and pregnant females
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the gastric insufflation assessed by ultrasound guided measurement of change in gastric antral cross-sectional area from baseline with AmbuAuraGainâ?¢ and LMA Proseal in patients scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesiaTimepoint: to compare the gastric antral volume 1.preoperatively <br/ ><br>2.after FMV <br/ ><br>3.during PPV <br/ ><br>4.at the end of surgery.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The secondary objectives were: to compare oropharyngeal sealing pressure,time taken to insert LMATimepoint: to monitor sealing pressure using cuff pressure monitor and time taken for placement of LMA 1.Preoperatively <br/ ><br>2. after FMV <br/ ><br>3. during PPV <br/ ><br>4. at the end od surgery