Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04026451
NCT04026451
Withdrawn
Not Applicable

Use of Spectral Analysis of Electroencephalographic Activity to Guide Deep Sedoanalgesia and Its Effect on Propofol Consumption in Patients Hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit: a Pilot Study

University of Chile2 sites in 1 countryNovember 11, 2019

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Sedation guided by SEF95 (10-13 Hz) from SedLine® monitor
Conditions
Deep Sedation
Sponsor
University of Chile
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Plasma concentration of propofol
Status
Withdrawn
Last Updated
3 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Critically ill patients under mechanical ventilation (MV) have pain, anxiety, sleep deprivation and agitation. The use of analgesics and sedatives drugs (sedoanalgesia) is a common practice to produce pain relief and comfort during the VM. Despite its usefulness, it has been documented that the excessive use of sedatives is associated with an increased risk of prolonging the stay under MV and in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). To avoid this, current evidence suggests the use of protocols guided to clinical goals, such as the sedation-agitation scale (SAS), or daily suspension of infusions to avoid excess sedation. These protocols minimize the prescription of deep sedation, which is still necessary for 20-30% of patients.

Monitoring of sedation with electroencephalography in the ICU has been underutilized. In fact, only the use of indices that are generated from algorithms of the electroencephalographic signal processing has been reported. However, it has been shown that the use of these monitoring systems does not benefit the heterogeneous groups of patients in MV. Currently, the clinical monitors used to measure the effect of drugs used in a sedoanalgesia show in the screen the spectrogram of the brain electrical signal and quantify the frequency under which 95% of the electroencephalographic power is located, known as spectral edge frequency 95 (SEF95). This value in a person who is conscious is usually greater than 20 Hz, in a patient undergoing general anesthesia it is between 10 and 15 Hz. In preliminary measurements, in deeply sedated patients in the ICU, SEF95 values are under 5 Hz. This would indicate that patients in the ICU are being overdosed. It is unknown if in cases with an indication of deep sedation, the use of monitoring by spectrogram is superior to the standard management guided at clinical scales, such as SAS.

Therefore, the investigators propose the following hypothesis: In patients with an appropriate indication of deep sedation (SAS 1-2), the sedoanalgesia guided by the spectral edge frequency 95 reduces the consumption of propofol compared to the deep sedoanalgesia guided by the sedation scale agitation in MV patients in the ICU maintaining a clinically adequate level of sedation.

Detailed Description

To determine whether deep sedoanalgesia guided by the spectral edge frequency 95 decreases propofol consumption with respect to deep sedoanalgesia guided by the sedation-agitation scale in patients hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit under mechanical ventilation. * Group intervention: sedation will be guided by SEF95 and SAS. Patients will be sedated to keep a SAS 1-2 with a SEF95 between 10 to 13 Hz. * Group control: sedation will be guided by SAS. However, SEF95 will be also recorded but covered.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 11, 2019
End Date
April 1, 2021
Last Updated
3 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
University of Chile
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Antonello Penna

Anesthesiologist, MD, PhD

University of Chile

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Older than 18 years
  • Indication of deep sedation with propofol and fentanyl for more than 48 h

Exclusion Criteria

  • Brain damage
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Allergy to propofol or fentanyl
  • Limitation of therapeutic effort
  • Liver chronic disease Child C
  • Prone positioning and use of neuromuscular blocking agents

Arms & Interventions

Intervention

Critical care patients with an indication of deep sedation and mechanical ventilation will be sedated with an infusion of propofol and fentanyl guided by SEF95 obtained by SedLine® monitor to keep a SAS 1-2. The target of SEF95 will be 10-13 Hz to keep SAS 1-2.

Intervention: Sedation guided by SEF95 (10-13 Hz) from SedLine® monitor

Intervention

Critical care patients with an indication of deep sedation and mechanical ventilation will be sedated with an infusion of propofol and fentanyl guided by SEF95 obtained by SedLine® monitor to keep a SAS 1-2. The target of SEF95 will be 10-13 Hz to keep SAS 1-2.

Intervention: Sedation guided by SAS scale (1-2)

Intervention

Critical care patients with an indication of deep sedation and mechanical ventilation will be sedated with an infusion of propofol and fentanyl guided by SEF95 obtained by SedLine® monitor to keep a SAS 1-2. The target of SEF95 will be 10-13 Hz to keep SAS 1-2.

Intervention: Deep sedation with propofol andfentanyl

Intervention

Critical care patients with an indication of deep sedation and mechanical ventilation will be sedated with an infusion of propofol and fentanyl guided by SEF95 obtained by SedLine® monitor to keep a SAS 1-2. The target of SEF95 will be 10-13 Hz to keep SAS 1-2.

Intervention: Mechanical Ventilation

Control

Critical care patients with an indication of deep sedation and mechanical ventilation will be sedated with an infusion of propofol and fentanyl guided by SAS (1-2). SedLine® monitor will be also used in these patients but the screen will be covered.

Intervention: Sedation guided by SAS scale (1-2)

Control

Critical care patients with an indication of deep sedation and mechanical ventilation will be sedated with an infusion of propofol and fentanyl guided by SAS (1-2). SedLine® monitor will be also used in these patients but the screen will be covered.

Intervention: Deep sedation with propofol andfentanyl

Control

Critical care patients with an indication of deep sedation and mechanical ventilation will be sedated with an infusion of propofol and fentanyl guided by SAS (1-2). SedLine® monitor will be also used in these patients but the screen will be covered.

Intervention: Mechanical Ventilation

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Plasma concentration of propofol

Time Frame: 48 hours

It will be measured using HPLC

Secondary Outcomes

  • Stay in intensive unit care(Up to 30 days)
  • Plasma triglyceride levels(24 hours and 48 hours)
  • Duration of mechanical ventilation(Up to 30 days)
  • Delirium(Up to 10 days)
  • Total dose of propofol(Each 2 hours for 48 hours)
  • Total dose of fentanyl(Each 2 hours for 48 hours)
  • SEF95(Each 2 hours for 48 hours)
  • Mean Arterial Pressure(Each 2 hours for 48 hours)
  • Wake up after stopping the infusion of propofol(Up to 48 hours)
  • SAS (Sedation Agitation Scale)(Each 2 hours for 48 hours)
  • Plasma lactate concentration(24 hours and 48 hours)

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials