Comparison of Different Video Laryngoscopes in < 1 Year Old Undergoing Neurosurgical Operations: a Prospective Randomized Study

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Intubation;Difficult
• Interventions: Device: c-mac; Device: airtraq

• Registration Number: NCT04153357
• Lead Sponsor: Kocaeli University

Brief Summary

İntubation of pediatric patients is a challenging problem. Video laryngoscopes increased the intubation success rate. We want to compare different video laryngoscopes in this field.

Detailed Description

Aim:İntubation of pediatric patients is a challenging problem. Video laryngoscopes increased the intubation success rate. We want to compare different video laryngoscopes in this field.

methods: We enroll total 50 patients \< 1 year old undergoing neurosurgery. We compared the intubation times, success rates and minor complications of Airtraq and c-mac video laryngoscopes in these pediatric patients undergoing neurosurgery.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2019-11-04
• Study First Submitted QC: 2019-11-04
• Study Start: 2019-11-05
• Study First Posted: 2019-11-06
• Primary Completion: 2020-02-05
• Study Completion: 2020-02-05
• Status Verified: 2023-03
• Last Update Submitted: 2023-03-17
• Last Update Posted: 2023-03-21

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 50

Inclusion Criteria

< 1 years old

• undergoing neurosurgery ASA 1-2

Exclusion Criteria

• > 1 year old
• asa 3-4
• emergency

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: CROSSOVER

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
intubation time of c-mac	c-mac	intubation time of c-mac
intubation time airtraq	airtraq	intubation time of Airtraq

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
intubation time	30 seconds	device entering the oral cavity till visualization of the endotracheal tube entering the vocal cords

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Kocaeli University Medical Faculty; 🇹🇷 Kocaeli, Turkey