Comparison of McGRATH and the Macintosh laryngoscope for the tracheal intubation in child -Prospective randomized control study
- Conditions
- The patient who are performed tracheal intubation under general anesthesiaMcGRATHAiway management
- Registration Number
- JPRN-jRCT1032220366
- Lead Sponsor
- Saito Tomoyuki
- Brief Summary
In small children without predicted dif- ficult airways, time to intubate the trachea was significantly longer for a McGRATH MAC blade 1 than a Macintosh blade 1.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
1) The patient who are performed tracheal intubation under general anesthesia
2) The patient that age is 4 years or younger
3)The patient who has good state of the general condition(ASA1,2)
4)The patient in whom physician can obtain written informed consent from parents
1)The patient who has an operation in emergency
2)The patient that difficult airway is expected
3)The patient who may aspirate it
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time to intubate the trachea
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The time to visualize the larynx, C-L classification
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.