Comparison of the Effects of Truview Laryngoscopy and Macintosh Larygonscopy on Intubation Difficulty Score, Intubation Duration and Intubation Quality in Pediatric Patients Between 2-12 Years
- Conditions
- All the Pediatric Patients Needed Intubation for Surgery
- Interventions
- Procedure: Truview EVO2 laryngoscopeProcedure: Macintosh laryngoscope
- Registration Number
- NCT02069444
- Lead Sponsor
- Ankara University
- Brief Summary
For endotracheal entubation in children mostly Miller and Macintosh blades have been used. On the other hand Truview EVO2 laringoscopes can maintain a better laryngeal view without having a direct sight of the airway and without having to align oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal axes. The aim of this study is to compare the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of intubation difficulty score, time to intubation and intubation quality score.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
- aged 2-12 pediatric patients
- any allergy
- difficult airway history
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Truview EVO2 laryngoscope Truview EVO2 laryngoscope patients intubated withTruview EVO2 laryngoscope Macintosh laryngoscope Macintosh laryngoscope patients intubated with Macintosh laryngoscope
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ease laryngoscopy in children during laryngoscopy
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Ankara University, Pediatric Surgery
🇹🇷Ankara, Turkey
Ankara University
🇹🇷Ankara, Turkey