MedPath

Comparison of the Effects of Truview Laryngoscopy and Macintosh Larygonscopy on Intubation Difficulty Score, Intubation Duration and Intubation Quality in Pediatric Patients Between 2-12 Years

Completed
Conditions
All the Pediatric Patients Needed Intubation for Surgery
Interventions
Procedure: Truview EVO2 laryngoscope
Procedure: Macintosh laryngoscope
Registration Number
NCT02069444
Lead Sponsor
Ankara University
Brief Summary

For endotracheal entubation in children mostly Miller and Macintosh blades have been used. On the other hand Truview EVO2 laringoscopes can maintain a better laryngeal view without having a direct sight of the airway and without having to align oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal axes. The aim of this study is to compare the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of intubation difficulty score, time to intubation and intubation quality score.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • aged 2-12 pediatric patients
Exclusion Criteria
  • any allergy
  • difficult airway history

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Truview EVO2 laryngoscopeTruview EVO2 laryngoscopepatients intubated withTruview EVO2 laryngoscope
Macintosh laryngoscopeMacintosh laryngoscopepatients intubated with Macintosh laryngoscope
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
ease laryngoscopy in childrenduring laryngoscopy
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Ankara University, Pediatric Surgery

🇹🇷

Ankara, Turkey

Ankara University

🇹🇷

Ankara, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath