MedPath

Comparison Four Intubation Devices

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Intubation
Interventions
Device: MIL
Device: MAC
Device: WIS
Device: PHIL
Registration Number
NCT02280213
Lead Sponsor
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Brief Summary

Comparison of four laryngoscope blades (Miller, Macintosh, Phillips and Wis-Hipple) for infant intubation during resuscitation with and without chest compressions.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
145
Inclusion Criteria
  • give voluntary consent to participate in the study
  • paramedics
  • no clinical experience in infant intubation
Exclusion Criteria
  • not meet the above criteria
  • wrist or low back diseases
  • pregnancy.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Intubation with chest compressionMILEndotracheal intubation of infant mannikin using different laryngoscope blades (MAC, MIL, PHIL, WIS) with uninterrupted chest compressions. Chest compressions with the two thumb-encircling hands technique were performed by the same Basic Life Support (BLS) instructor at a rate of 100 compressions per minute and at a depth of about 1.5 inches according to the European Resuscitation Council guidelines of 2010 year.
Intubation with chest compressionPHILEndotracheal intubation of infant mannikin using different laryngoscope blades (MAC, MIL, PHIL, WIS) with uninterrupted chest compressions. Chest compressions with the two thumb-encircling hands technique were performed by the same Basic Life Support (BLS) instructor at a rate of 100 compressions per minute and at a depth of about 1.5 inches according to the European Resuscitation Council guidelines of 2010 year.
Intubation without chest compressionWISEndotracheal intubation of infant mannikin using different laryngoscope blades (MAC, MIL, PHIL, WIS) during resuscitation without chest compressions.
Intubation without chest compressionMILEndotracheal intubation of infant mannikin using different laryngoscope blades (MAC, MIL, PHIL, WIS) during resuscitation without chest compressions.
Intubation without chest compressionMACEndotracheal intubation of infant mannikin using different laryngoscope blades (MAC, MIL, PHIL, WIS) during resuscitation without chest compressions.
Intubation without chest compressionPHILEndotracheal intubation of infant mannikin using different laryngoscope blades (MAC, MIL, PHIL, WIS) during resuscitation without chest compressions.
Intubation with chest compressionMACEndotracheal intubation of infant mannikin using different laryngoscope blades (MAC, MIL, PHIL, WIS) with uninterrupted chest compressions. Chest compressions with the two thumb-encircling hands technique were performed by the same Basic Life Support (BLS) instructor at a rate of 100 compressions per minute and at a depth of about 1.5 inches according to the European Resuscitation Council guidelines of 2010 year.
Intubation with chest compressionWISEndotracheal intubation of infant mannikin using different laryngoscope blades (MAC, MIL, PHIL, WIS) with uninterrupted chest compressions. Chest compressions with the two thumb-encircling hands technique were performed by the same Basic Life Support (BLS) instructor at a rate of 100 compressions per minute and at a depth of about 1.5 inches according to the European Resuscitation Council guidelines of 2010 year.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time to intubation1 day

time from insertion of the blade to the first manual ventilation of the manikin´s lungs. If time of intubation is over than 60 seconds, attempt was recognized as failure.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Success of intubation1 day

effectiveness of the first, second and third intubation attempts and overall effectiveness of intubation by participants using four intubation devices. If the examinee failed at all attempts, the case was excluded from the time calculations.

Ease of Use1 day

To access subjective opinions about the difficulty of the each intubation method, participants were asked to give a rating on a visual analogue scale (VAS) with a score from 1 (extremely easy) to 10 (extremely difficult).

POGO score1 day

The POGO score describes how much glottic opening is visible. A POGO score of 100% indicates visualization of the entire glottic opening from the anterior commissure of the vocal cords to the interarytenoid notch. A POGO score of 0% corresponds with no visualization of laryngeal structures.

Cormack-Lehane grading1 day

self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization using the Cormack-Lehane grading (grade 1-4)

dental compression1 day

pressure applied on the upper teeth (n=none, mild=1, moderate=2, severe=3)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education

🇵🇱

Warsaw, Masovia, Poland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath