Comparison Four Intubation Devices
- Conditions
- Intubation
- Interventions
- Device: MILDevice: MACDevice: WISDevice: PHIL
- Registration Number
- NCT02280213
- Lead Sponsor
- International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
- Brief Summary
Comparison of four laryngoscope blades (Miller, Macintosh, Phillips and Wis-Hipple) for infant intubation during resuscitation with and without chest compressions.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 145
- give voluntary consent to participate in the study
- paramedics
- no clinical experience in infant intubation
- not meet the above criteria
- wrist or low back diseases
- pregnancy.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Intubation with chest compression MIL Endotracheal intubation of infant mannikin using different laryngoscope blades (MAC, MIL, PHIL, WIS) with uninterrupted chest compressions. Chest compressions with the two thumb-encircling hands technique were performed by the same Basic Life Support (BLS) instructor at a rate of 100 compressions per minute and at a depth of about 1.5 inches according to the European Resuscitation Council guidelines of 2010 year. Intubation with chest compression PHIL Endotracheal intubation of infant mannikin using different laryngoscope blades (MAC, MIL, PHIL, WIS) with uninterrupted chest compressions. Chest compressions with the two thumb-encircling hands technique were performed by the same Basic Life Support (BLS) instructor at a rate of 100 compressions per minute and at a depth of about 1.5 inches according to the European Resuscitation Council guidelines of 2010 year. Intubation without chest compression WIS Endotracheal intubation of infant mannikin using different laryngoscope blades (MAC, MIL, PHIL, WIS) during resuscitation without chest compressions. Intubation without chest compression MIL Endotracheal intubation of infant mannikin using different laryngoscope blades (MAC, MIL, PHIL, WIS) during resuscitation without chest compressions. Intubation without chest compression MAC Endotracheal intubation of infant mannikin using different laryngoscope blades (MAC, MIL, PHIL, WIS) during resuscitation without chest compressions. Intubation without chest compression PHIL Endotracheal intubation of infant mannikin using different laryngoscope blades (MAC, MIL, PHIL, WIS) during resuscitation without chest compressions. Intubation with chest compression MAC Endotracheal intubation of infant mannikin using different laryngoscope blades (MAC, MIL, PHIL, WIS) with uninterrupted chest compressions. Chest compressions with the two thumb-encircling hands technique were performed by the same Basic Life Support (BLS) instructor at a rate of 100 compressions per minute and at a depth of about 1.5 inches according to the European Resuscitation Council guidelines of 2010 year. Intubation with chest compression WIS Endotracheal intubation of infant mannikin using different laryngoscope blades (MAC, MIL, PHIL, WIS) with uninterrupted chest compressions. Chest compressions with the two thumb-encircling hands technique were performed by the same Basic Life Support (BLS) instructor at a rate of 100 compressions per minute and at a depth of about 1.5 inches according to the European Resuscitation Council guidelines of 2010 year.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time to intubation 1 day time from insertion of the blade to the first manual ventilation of the manikin´s lungs. If time of intubation is over than 60 seconds, attempt was recognized as failure.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Success of intubation 1 day effectiveness of the first, second and third intubation attempts and overall effectiveness of intubation by participants using four intubation devices. If the examinee failed at all attempts, the case was excluded from the time calculations.
Ease of Use 1 day To access subjective opinions about the difficulty of the each intubation method, participants were asked to give a rating on a visual analogue scale (VAS) with a score from 1 (extremely easy) to 10 (extremely difficult).
POGO score 1 day The POGO score describes how much glottic opening is visible. A POGO score of 100% indicates visualization of the entire glottic opening from the anterior commissure of the vocal cords to the interarytenoid notch. A POGO score of 0% corresponds with no visualization of laryngeal structures.
Cormack-Lehane grading 1 day self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization using the Cormack-Lehane grading (grade 1-4)
dental compression 1 day pressure applied on the upper teeth (n=none, mild=1, moderate=2, severe=3)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
🇵🇱Warsaw, Masovia, Poland