跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03278847
NCT03278847已完成不适用

Optimising Newborn Nutrition During Therapeutic Hypothermia: an Observational Study Using Routinely Collected Data

Imperial College London2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 6,030 人开始时间: 2010年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
6,030
试验地点
2
主要终点
Blood Stream Infection - for the Parenteral Nutrition Comparison

研究概览

简要总结

The overarching aim of this project is to determine the optimum enteral and parenteral nutrition strategy for newborns with Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy (HIE) during and after therapeutic hypothermia. To do this the investigators will perform two primary comparisons:

  1. ENTERAL: to determine whether any enteral (milk) feeding, when compared to withholding enteral feeding (no milk), during therapeutic hypothermia, is associated with a difference in the incidence of necrotising enterocolitis.
  2. PARENTERAL: to determine whether provision of intravenous dextrose, when compared to provision of parenteral nutrition, during therapeutic hypothermia, is associated with a difference in the incidence of blood stream infection.

The investigators will use de-identified data held in an established research database called the National Neonatal Research Database (NNRD) and we will use the potential outcomes framework with application of propensity scoring to define matched subgroups for comparison.

详细描述

Every year about 1200 babies in England, Wales and Scotland suffer from a lack of oxygen around birth which can lead to long-term brain injury or death. This is called Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy (HIE). Research has shown that cooling babies with HIE by a few degrees for the first 3 days protects the brain; all babies with moderate or severe HIE in the UK are treated with therapeutic hypothermia (cooling).

Doctors do not know how best to care for babies while they are cooled. A key question is "how to provide nutrition to babies during cooling". There are two main parts to this question, milk feeds ("enteral" nutrition) and intravenous nutrition ("parenteral" nutrition). Doctors don't know how best to provide either milk or intravenous nutrition to cooled babies.

  • MILK FEEDS: Some neonatal units in the UK carefully feed babies (usually with maternal breast milk) while they are cooled. This avoids intravenous lines and is believed to help them feed and go home earlier. Other neonatal units do not feed cooled babies because they worry about a condition called necrotising enterocolitis (a devastating and often fatal disease) which might be more common with feeding.
  • INTRAVENOUS NUTRITION: All cooled babies need intravenous fluid (even when milk feeds are given it takes several days before enough fluid can be given this way). Some neonatal units give babies intravenous nutrition (which contains fat, protein, carbohydrate, vitamins and minerals) as this may improve growth and recovery. Other neonatal units only give intravenous dextrose with simple salts because of concerns that intravenous nutrition leads to more infections. This study will compare these different ways of providing nutrition. It will use a research database called the National Neonatal Research Database (NNRD). In England, Scotland and Wales doctors and nurses looking after babies in neonatal care (including all cooled babies) use an Electronic Health Record system. Data from this system are anonymised (no baby can be identified) and form the NNRD, so the NNRD holds data from all babies who have been looked after on NHS neonatal units.

The investigators have worked closely with parents and charities in developing the NNRD. The investigators will use the NNRD to study all term babies who received cooling in England, Scotland and Wales since 2008. The investigators will compare the milk feeding and intravenous nutrition they receive.

  • MILK FEEDING: The investigators will compare babies who are fed milk while cooled with those that are not fed any milk. The investigator's main goal is to establish whether there is any difference in rates of necrotising enterocolitis.
  • INTRAVENOUS NUTRITION: The investigators will compare babies who get intravenous nutrition with those that only get intravenous dextrose. The main difference we are looking for is in the rate of infection. The investigators will also study how many babies die, how long they stay in neonatal care, how soon breastfeeding starts and many are breastfed when they go home.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

年龄范围
— 至 4 Days(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Received neonatal care at a unit that is part of the UK Neonatal Collaborative; this includes all NHS neonatal units in England, Scotland and Wales
  • Recorded gestational age at birth ≥36 weeks
  • Recorded as receiving therapeutic hypothermia for 72 hours or died during therapeutic hypothermia

排除标准

  • Infants with missing data for principal background and outcome variables.

结局指标

主要结局

Blood Stream Infection - for the Parenteral Nutrition Comparison

时间窗: From date of birth until date of final neonatal unit discharge, assessed up to 1 year

defined according to the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) National Neonatal Audit Programme (NNAP) case definition: pure growth of a recognised pathogen from a normally sterile site

Necrotising Enterocolitis - for the Enteral Nutrition Comparison

时间窗: From date of birth until date of final neonatal unit discharge, assessed up to 1 year

Defined according to the case definition of Battersby et al., 2017, JAMA Pediatrics

次要结局

  • Breastfeeding(At the point of final discharge from neonatal care, assessed up to 1 year)
  • Growth(From date of birth until date of final neonatal unit discharge, assessed up to 1 year)
  • Survival(From date of birth until date of final neonatal unit discharge, assessed up to 1 year)
  • Duration of Central Venous Line(From date of birth until date of final neonatal unit discharge, assessed up to 1 year)
  • Length of Stay(From date of birth until date of final neonatal unit discharge, assessed up to 1 year)
  • Hypoglycaemia(From date of birth until date of final neonatal unit discharge, assessed up to 1 year)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验