COMPARISION OF SOFT TISSUE RESPONSE TO DIFFERENT IMPLANT HEALING ABUTMENTS TITANIUM , ZIRCONIA AND PEEKâ?? â?? AN INVIVO STUDY
Not Applicable
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2019/10/021550
- Lead Sponsor
- Samudrala Tejaswini
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
No history of previous implant loss, major pathology or irradiation.
Requirements for implant placement include sufficient bone width and height.
Exclusion Criteria
Insufficient bone volume at the recipient sites for placement of an implant.
Active infection or severe inflammation in the areas intended for implant placement.
Patients with any existing systemic diseases.
Alcohol or drug abuse.
Smoking.
Pregnancy and lactation
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Response and health of soft tissue towards three different types of healing abutments Titanium, Zirconia and PEEK are sameTimepoint: 3 months after implant installation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method healing of the soft tissues with three abutmentsTimepoint: Three months following implant installation