跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03690492
NCT03690492已完成不适用

The Box 2.0: Using Smart Technology for Early Diagnosis of Complications After Cardiovascular Surgery

Leiden University Medical Center2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 730 人开始时间: 2018年10月2日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
730
试验地点
2
主要终点
Dectection of and time to detection of atrial fibrillation

研究概览

简要总结

The objective of this study is to determine the effect on quality of care when introducing smart technology in patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery. Patients who consent to take part in the study, receive a box containing two smartphone compatible ECG monitors, an oxygen saturation monitor, a weight scale, a thermometer, an activity tracker and a blood pressure monitor. They will be followed up by replacing one of the outpatient clinic visits by an e-consult, in which a patients does not have to go to the hospital. Instead, he or she will talk with his or her doctor or nurse practitioner via a secured video connection. The primary endpoint of the study will be the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation within 3 months after cardiac surgery.

详细描述

Over the past five years, smartphone compatible detectors of cardiovascular disease parameters have been released on the consumers market. Examples of these include heart rate monitors, ECG monitors, blood pressure monitors, activity trackers and fat percentages monitors. These monitors have often been validated and are CE-marked for use in the European Union within their intended use.

Recent publications implicate that home monitoring with such consumer devices might improve quality of care. A study by Bosworth et al. in patients with hypertension showed that increased monitoring and subsequent treatment led to a better controlled blood pressure in patients who were treated for hypertension. Another study, which is currently being carried out at the LUMC, is investigating whether patients benefit from a smart technology intervention after they had a myocardial infarction. Preliminary (unpublished) results show that clinical outcomes are similar, with higher patient satisfaction. Cost analyses show that there is a cost reduction per patient with smart technology follow-up. Therefore, smart technology could be a useful tool to improve patient monitoring and therefore patient safety.

Patients who are discharged after they underwent cardiovascular surgery are at risk to develop one or more of three most seen late complications: sternal wound infection, cardiac decompensation or rhythm disturbances such as atrial fibrillation. This is not always detected before those patients are discharged.

Currently, patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery return to the outpatient clinic 14 days and three months after discharge. They are seen by a specialist nurse or cardiologist, who will perform a general check-up and inspect the sternal wound. An echocardiogram will be performed before the three-month visit. If there is suspicion for a rhythm disturbance on the outpatient clinic visit, the cardiologist might decide to perform Holter monitoring during 24 hours. As this is a small window of time, not all rhythm disturbances will be diagnosed. Smart technology is hypothesized to increase the chances of diagnosing rhythm disturbances. In the case of sternal wound infection and cardiac decompensation, smart technology may show a declining trend before a patient visits the outpatient clinic, which can lead to early detection and treatment.

A small pilot study by McElroy et all found that after cardiovascular surgery, both the patient as well as the health care team are highly satisfied with added smart technology, due to the ease of use of the technology and platform. There was a main focus on readmission rates, which did not differ between the groups. However the trend shows an increase in diagnosing atrial fibrillation (15,4 vs 29,6%), sternal wound infection or cardiac decompensation were not studied.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patient undergoes cardiovascular surgery: CABG, valve reconstruction or replacement, aortic root or ascending aortic surgery, or any other cardiothoracic surgery performed by median sternotomy such as atrial or ventricular septal defect closure, Dor or Morrow procedure, cardiac tumor removal and/or surgical treatment of coronary artery anomalies.
  • Patient is able to communicate in English or Dutch
  • Patient has been referred by a cardiologist from the Leiden University Medical Center, Cardiological Center Voorschoten, Alrijne Hospital or Haaglanden Medical Center

排除标准

  • Patient is < 18 years old
  • Patient is pregnant
  • Patient is considered an incapacitated adult
  • Patient is unwilling to sign the informed consent form
  • Patient undergoes emergency thoracic surgery (INTERMACS 1 or 2)
  • Patient has active endocarditis at the time of operation
  • Patient is on mechanical circulatory support before operation
  • Patient has a ventricular septal rupture
  • Patient undergoes extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or ventricular assist device insertion

结局指标

主要结局

Dectection of and time to detection of atrial fibrillation

时间窗: Until 3 months after surgery

Diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and the time it took a subject to reach that outcome, measured in both study arms

次要结局

  • Re-admission to either the cardiology or thoracic surgery ward(Until 3 months after surgery)
  • Blood pressure control(3 months after surgery)
  • Dectection of and time to detection of cardiac decompensation(Until 3 months after surgery)
  • Overall mortality(3 months after surgery)
  • Detection of and time to detection of sternal wound infection(Until 3 months after surgery)
  • Major adverse cardiac events(Until 3 months after surgery)
  • Quality of Life (QoL)(3 months after surgery)
  • Patient satisfaction of care(3 months after surgery)
  • Total amount of cardiology related visits to an emergency department until three months after discharge(Until 3 months after surgery)
  • Cost-effectiveness(2 years)

研究者

发起方
Leiden University Medical Center
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

RoderickTreskes

Principal Investigator

Leiden University Medical Center

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验