MedPath

Spanish Version of Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire in Patients with Musculoskeletal Injuries

Completed
Conditions
Validation Study
Interventions
Other: Validation CEQ
Registration Number
NCT06260800
Lead Sponsor
University of Valladolid
Brief Summary

Physiotherapy treatment of musculoskeletal injuries should be performed following the main clinical guidelines of person-centered care. Patients' perception of the abilities and facilities provided by physiotherapists boost a convenient therapeutic relationship. This relation is linked with more satisfaction and adherence during the treatment, as well as credibility and expectancy of the patient related to the treatment. Thus, Credibility and Expectancy questionnaire is normally used to assess that point. CEQ presents good psychometric properties when used in Physisiotherapy interventions, but there is not a spanish version of this questionaire.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
76
Inclusion Criteria
  • Volunteer patients who are going to start physiotherapy treatment due to musculoskeletal injuries.
  • Age above 18 years old.
  • Understanding of the study purpose and signing the informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with cognitive deprivation.
  • Not able to fill in the questionnaires autonomously.
  • Mother tongue different from Spanish.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
CEQ ValidationValidation CEQIn initial assessment, EQ-5D-5L and HADS questionnaires were completed. After sessions 1 and 2, CEQ and WAI-S were filled. Finally, EQ-5D-5L was completed before the fourth session.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Content validityDuring the intervention: Session 1 and 2 treatment

Credibility and Expectancy questionnaire (CEQ) must be completed, while registering the time used and the quality and the reading comprehension.

Criterion validityDuring the intervention: session 1 and 4 treatment.

Comparing CEQ with a gold standard.

Construct validityDuring the intervention: session 1 and 2 treatment

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA) were performed. For EFA Kaiser criterion \>0.70 will be acceptable. For CFA, goodness of fit index and comparative fit index were calculated, where values up to 0.90 were acceptable.

ReliabilityDuring the intervention: Session 1 and 2 treatment

Credibility and Expectancy questionnaire (CEQ) reliability will be analised through internal consistency (alpha Cronbach \> 0.70 recomended)) and test-retest (intraclass correlation coeficient \>0.70 acceptable).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Silvia Lahuerta Martín

🇪🇸

Soria, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath