MedPath

Influenza HA Ferritin Vaccine, Alone or in Prime-Boost Regimens With an Influenza DNA Vaccine in Healthy Adults

Phase 1
Completed
Conditions
Influenza
Interventions
Biological: VRC-FLUNPF081-00-VP (HA-F A/Sing)
Biological: VRC-FLUDNA082-00-VP (DNA A/Sing)
Registration Number
NCT03186781
Lead Sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Brief Summary

Background:

Influenza, or "flu", is a very common infectious respiratory disease. Researchers want to develop a vaccine against flu. Vaccines teach the body to fight or prevent an infection. When the body learns to fight an infection, this is called an immune response. In this study, researchers want to test two new vaccines to help the body make an immune response to flu.

Subjects received the vaccine injections in the upper arm muscle. One vaccine, the influenza HA Ferritin vaccine (HA-F A/Sing), was given to all subjects with a needle injection. The other vaccine, influenza DNA vaccine (DNA A/Sing), was given to subjects in Group 3 by a needle-free device that uses high pressure to push the vaccine through the skin and into the muscle.

Objective:

To test the safety and side effects of two new vaccines for prevention of H2 influenza (flu).

Eligibility:

Part I: Healthy adults ages 18-47 born after 1969.

Part II: Healthy adults ages 18-70, but not born in 1966-1969.

Design:

Volunteers were tested for eligibility in a separate screening protocol.

In Part I, all subjects received injections of HA Ferritin vaccine. These subjects were not expected to have H2N2 exposure based on their age and when H2N2 last circulated in the population. Five subjects in Group 1 received one injection of 20 mcg dose vaccine at Day 0 to test if it is safe. Then, five additional subjects in Group 2 received a total of two injections of a 60 mcg dose on Day 0 and 16 weeks later.

In Part II, responses were evaluated from adults born before 1966 who may have prior potential exposure to H2N2 influenza as well as adults similar to those enrolled in Part I who are not expected to have H2N2 exposure. Also, Part II compared responses to 2 different vaccine regimens. Group 3 subjects received a DNA influenza vaccine prime at Day 0 and the HA Ferritin vaccine boost 16 weeks later. Group 4 subjects received the HA Ferritin vaccine 2 times, on Day 0 and 16 weeks later.

Detailed Description

Study Design: This is a Phase I open-label, dose escalation study to evaluate the dose, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of VRC-FLUNPF081-00-VP (HA-F A/Sing) vaccine alone or in prime-boost regimens with VRC-FLUDNA082-00-VP (DNA A/Sing) vaccine. The hypotheses are that VRC-FLUNPF081-00-VP and VRC-FLUDNA082-00-VP vaccines are safe, well-tolerated, and induce an immune response to the H2 antigen. The primary objectives are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of two different doses of the HA-F A/Sing vaccine alone and in prime-boost regimens in healthy adults. Secondary objectives are related to the evaluation of the immunogenicity of the HA-F A/Sing and DNA A/Sing vaccines in prime-boost regimens.

Study Products: The investigational HA-F A/Sing vaccine, developed by the Vaccine Research Center (VRC), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), is composed of Helicobacter pylori non-haem ferritin with an influenza virus H2 hemagglutinin (HA) insert to form a nanoparticle displaying eight HA trimers from A/Singapore/1/57 (H2N2) influenza.

The investigational DNA A/Sing vaccine, developed by the VRC, NIAID, is composed of a single closed-circular DNA plasmid that encodes the H2 protein of A/Singapore/1/57 influenza.

Subjects: Up to 80 healthy adults ages 18-70 were enrolled; adults born between 1966 and 1969 were excluded from the trial.

Study Plan: Vaccines were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the deltoid muscle. This study has two parts:

Part I evaluated the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of 1 or 2 doses of the HA-F A/Sing vaccine in a dose-escalation design. In Group 1, five subjects received a 20 mcg dose of the HA-F A/Sing vaccine via needle and syringe on Day 0. If this dose was assessed as safe and well tolerated, enrollment began for Group 2. In Group 2, five subjects received the higher 60 mcg dose of the HA-F A/Sing vaccine via needle and syringe on Day 0 and Week 16. If this higher dose was assessed as safe, enrollment began for Part II.

Part II evaluated the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of HA-F A/Sing vaccine in prime-boost regimens. Subjects were stratified by age and randomized equally into Groups 3 and Group 4. In Group 3, subjects received DNA A/Sing vaccine via a PharmaJet Needle-Free Injector on Day 0 and HA-F A/Sing vaccine via needle and syringe on Week 16. In Group 4, subjects received HA-F A/Sing vaccine via needle and syringe on Day 0 and Week 16.

For Group 1, the protocol required about 8 clinic visits and 1 telephone follow up contact after the injection.

For Group 2, Group 3 and Group 4, the protocol required about 10 clinic visits and 2 telephone follow-up contacts after each injection.

For all Groups, solicited reactogenicity were evaluated using a 7-day diary card. Assessment of vaccine safety included clinical observation and monitoring of hematological and chemical parameters at clinical visits throughout the study.

Study Duration: Subjects were evaluated for 40 weeks following the first vaccine administration.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SEQUENTIAL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group 2: HA-F A/Sing (60 mcg), ages 18-47 YrsVRC-FLUNPF081-00-VP (HA-F A/Sing)HA-F A/Sing injections (60 mcg) administered IM by Needle/Syringe (Day 0 and Week 16) in H2-naïve adults (adults with no pre-existing immunity to H2)
Group 1: HA-F A/Sing (20 mcg), ages 18-47 YrsVRC-FLUNPF081-00-VP (HA-F A/Sing)HA-F A/Sing injections (20 mcg) administered intramuscularly (IM) by Needle/Syringe (Day 0) in H2-naïve adults (adults with no pre-existing immunity to H2)
Group 3A: DNA A/Sing(4 mg)-HA-F A/Sing(60 mcg), ages 18-47 YrsVRC-FLUNPF081-00-VP (HA-F A/Sing)DNA A/Sing injections (4 mg) administered IM by PharmaJet (Day 0); HA-F A/Sing injections (60 mcg) administered IM by Needle/Syringe (Week 16) in H2-naïve adults (adults with no pre-existing immunity to H2)
Group 3B: DNA A/Sing(4 mg)-HA-F A/Sing(60 mcg), ages 52-70 YrsVRC-FLUDNA082-00-VP (DNA A/Sing)DNA A/Sing injections (4 mg) administered IM by PharmaJet (Day 0); HA-F A/Sing injections (60 mcg) administered IM by Needle/Syringe (Week 16) in H2-exposed adults (may have some H2 immunity)
Group 3A: DNA A/Sing(4 mg)-HA-F A/Sing(60 mcg), ages 18-47 YrsVRC-FLUDNA082-00-VP (DNA A/Sing)DNA A/Sing injections (4 mg) administered IM by PharmaJet (Day 0); HA-F A/Sing injections (60 mcg) administered IM by Needle/Syringe (Week 16) in H2-naïve adults (adults with no pre-existing immunity to H2)
Group 4A: HA-F A/Sing (60 mcg), ages 18-47 YrsVRC-FLUNPF081-00-VP (HA-F A/Sing)HA-F A/Sing injections (60 mcg) administered IM by Needle/Syringe (Day 0 and Week 16) in H2-naïve adults (adults with no pre-existing immunity to H2)
Group 3B: DNA A/Sing(4 mg)-HA-F A/Sing(60 mcg), ages 52-70 YrsVRC-FLUNPF081-00-VP (HA-F A/Sing)DNA A/Sing injections (4 mg) administered IM by PharmaJet (Day 0); HA-F A/Sing injections (60 mcg) administered IM by Needle/Syringe (Week 16) in H2-exposed adults (may have some H2 immunity)
Group 4B: HA-F A/Sing (60 mcg), ages 52-70 YrsVRC-FLUNPF081-00-VP (HA-F A/Sing)HA-F A/Sing injections (60 mcg) administered IM by Needle/Syringe (Day 0 and Week 16) in H2-exposed adults (may have some H2 immunity)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Following DNA A/Sing Product AdministrationDay 0 through Day 280

SAEs were recorded from receipt of first study product administration through the last expected study visit at Day 280. The relationship between a SAE and the study product was assessed by the investigator based on clinical judgment and the definitions outlined in the protocol. A subject with multiple experiences of the same event is counted once using the event of worst severity.

Number of Subjects Reporting Local Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms Within 7 Days of DNA A/Sing Product Administration7 days after DNA A/Sing product administration, at approximately Week 1

Subjects recorded the occurrence of solicited symptoms on a diary card for 7 days after the DNA A/Sing study product administration and reviewed the diary card with clinic staff at a follow up visit. Subjects were counted once for each symptom at the worst severity if they indicated experiencing the symptom more than one time at any severity during the reporting period. The number reported for "Any Local Symptom" is the number of subjects reporting any local symptom at the worst severity. Reactogenicity grading (Mild, Moderate, Severe) was done using the Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials (FDA Guidance - September 2007).

Number of Subjects Reporting Local Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms Within 7 Days of Each HA-F A/Sing Product Administration7 days after each HA-F A/Sing product administration, at approximately Week 1 and/or at approximately Week 17

Subjects recorded the occurrence of solicited symptoms on a diary card for 7 days after each HA-F A/Sing study product administration and reviewed the diary card with clinic staff at a follow up visit. Subjects were counted once for each symptom at the worst severity if they indicated experiencing the symptom more than one time at any severity during the reporting period. The number reported for "Any Local Symptom" is the number of subjects reporting any local symptom at the worst severity. Reactogenicity grading (Mild, Moderate, Severe) was done using the Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials (FDA Guidance - September 2007).

Number of Subjects Reporting Systemic Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms Within 7 Days of DNA A/Sing Product Administration7 days after DNA A/Sing product administration, at approximately Week 1

Subjects recorded the occurrence of solicited symptoms on a diary card for 7 days after DNA A/Sing study product administration and reviewed the diary card with clinic staff at a follow up visit. Subjects were counted once for each symptom at the worst severity if they indicated experiencing the symptom more than one time at any severity during the reporting period. The number reported for "Any Systemic Symptom" is the number of subjects reporting any systemic symptom at the worst severity. Reactogenicity grading (Mild, Moderate, Severe) was done using the Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials (FDA Guidance - September 2007).

Number of Subjects With Abnormal Laboratory Measures of SafetyDay 0 through Day 280

Any abnormal laboratory results recorded as unsolicited adverse events (AEs) are summarized. Safety laboratory parameters included hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets, and white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell (RBC), neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, eosinophil and basophil percents/counts) and chemistry (alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alanine aspartate (AST), alkaline phosphate (ALP), creatinine and total bilirubin). Complete blood count (CBC) with differential, total bilirubin, AST, ALT, and ALP results were collected at screening (≤ 84 days before enrollment), Day 0 prior to study product administration (baseline), and at Days 14, 28, 112, 140 and 280. Creatinine results were collected at screening, Day 0 and Day 6. Institutional laboratory normal ranges as well as the Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventative Vaccine Clinical Trials FDA Guidance, September 2007 were used.

Number of Subjects Reporting Systemic Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms Within 7 Days of Each HA-F A/Sing Product Administration7 days after each HA-F A/Sing product administration, at approximately Week 1 and/or at approximately Week 17

Subjects recorded the occurrence of solicited symptoms on a diary card for 7 days after each HA-F A/Sing study product administration and reviewed the diary card with clinic staff at a follow up visit. Subjects were counted once for each symptom at the worst severity if they indicated experiencing the symptom more than one time at any severity during the reporting period. The number reported for "Any Systemic Symptom" is the number of subjects reporting any systemic symptom at the worst severity. Reactogenicity grading (Mild, Moderate, Severe) was done using the Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials (FDA Guidance - September 2007).

Number of Subjects With One or More Unsolicited Non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs) Following DNA A/Sing Product AdministrationDay 0 through 4 weeks after DNA A/Sing product administration, up to Week 4

Unsolicited AEs and attribution assessments were recorded in the study database from receipt of the first study product administration through the visit scheduled for 4 weeks after each study product administration. At other time periods between study product administrations and when greater than 4 weeks after the last study product administration, only serious AEs (SAEs reported as a separate outcome and in the AE module), influenza-like illness (ILI) or influenza (reported as a separate outcome) and new chronic medical conditions that required ongoing medical management were recorded through the last study visit. The relationship between an AE and the study product was assessed by the investigator based on clinical judgment and the definitions outlined in the protocol. A subject with multiple experiences of the same event is counted once using the event of worst severity.

Number of Subjects With Influenza or Influenza-like Illness (ILIs) Following HA-F A/Sing Product AdministrationDay 0 through Day 280

Influenza or influenza-like illness (ILI) were recorded in the study database from receipt of the first study product administration through the last study visit.

Number of Subjects With One or More Unsolicited Non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs) Following Each HA-F A/Sing Product AdministrationDay 0 through 4 weeks after each HA-F A/Sing product administration, up to Week 20

Unsolicited AEs and attribution assessments were recorded in the study database from receipt of the first study product administration through the visit scheduled for 4 weeks after each study product administration. At other time periods between study product administrations and when greater than 4 weeks after the last study product administration, only serious AEs (SAEs reported as a separate outcome and in the AE module), influenza-like illness (ILI) or influenza (reported as a separate outcome) and new chronic medical conditions that required ongoing medical management were recorded through the last study visit. The relationship between an AE and the study product was assessed by the investigator based on clinical judgment and the definitions outlined in the protocol. A subject with multiple experiences of the same event is counted once using the event of worst severity.

Number of Subjects With Influenza or Influenza-like Illness (ILIs) Following DNA A/Sing Product AdministrationDay 0 through Day 280

Influenza or influenza-like illness (ILI) were recorded in the study database from receipt of the first study product administration through the last study visit.

Number of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Following HA-F A/Sing Product AdministrationDay 0 through Day 280

SAEs were recorded from receipt of first study product administration through the last expected study visit at Day 280. The relationship between a SAE and the study product was assessed by the investigator based on clinical judgment and the definitions outlined in the protocol. A subject with multiple experiences of the same event is counted once using the event of worst severity.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pseudoviral Neutralization Assay Geometric Mean Titer (GMT) Against A/Singapore/1/1957 (H2N2) Following the Completion of Each Vaccine RegimenFour weeks after the first dose for groups that received a single vaccination, at Week 4 or two weeks after the second dose for groups that received two vaccinations, at Week 18

Pseudoviral neutralization antibody titers were determined against the homologous H2N2 A/Singapore/1/57 virus, and were summarized using geometric mean 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50). Negative samples were reported and IC50 titers were calculated using half the limit of detection. H2-naïve (ages 18-47 years) and H2-exposed (ages 52-70 years) subjects received either a single dose of 20 mcg HA-F A/Sing (H2-naïve), two doses of 60 mcg HA-F A/Sing 16 weeks apart (H2-naïve and H2-exposed), or a 4 mg DNA A/Sing prime followed by a single 60 mcg HA-F A/Sing boost at 16 weeks (H2-naïve and H2-exposed).

Seroconversion Rate Following the Completion of Each Vaccine RegimenFour weeks after the first dose for groups that received a single vaccination, at Week 4 or two weeks after the second dose for groups that received two vaccinations, at Week 18

Seroconversion rate: the proportion of subjects achieving seroconversion in hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI) antibody titer. Seroconversion rates for HAI were summarized as the proportion of individuals in each group experiencing a positive response, defined per the FDA criteria of positivity as either a baseline titer of less than 1:10 and a post vaccination titer of 1:40 or more or a baseline titer of 1:10 or more and a minimum four-fold rise after vaccination. H2-naïve (ages 18-47 years) and H2-exposed (ages 52-70 years) subjects received either a single dose of 20 mcg HA-F A/Sing (H2-naïve), two doses of 60 mcg HA-F A/Sing 16 weeks apart (H2-naïve and H2-exposed), or a 4 mg DNA A/Sing prime followed by a single 60 mcg HA-F A/Sing boost at 16 weeks (H2-naïve and H2-exposed).

Hemagglutination Inhibition Assay (HAI) Geometric Mean Titer (GMT) Against A/Singapore/1/1957 (H2N2) Following the Completion of Each Vaccine RegimenFour weeks after the first dose for groups that received a single vaccination, at Week 4 or two weeks after the second dose for groups that received two vaccinations, at Week 18

Hemagglutination inhibition assays (HAI) titers were determined against the homologous H2N2 A/Singapore/1/57 virus, and were summarized using geometric mean titers (GMTs). Negative samples were reported and GMTs were calculated using half the limit of detection. H2-naïve (ages 18-47 years) and H2-exposed (ages 52-70 years) subjects received either a single dose of 20 mcg HA-F A/Sing (H2-naïve), two doses of 60 mcg HA-F A/Sing 16 weeks apart (H2-naïve and H2-exposed), or a 4 mg DNA A/Sing prime followed by a single 60 mcg HA-F A/Sing boost at 16 weeks (H2-naïve and H2-exposed).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center

🇺🇸

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath