CTRI/2020/09/027981尚未招募1/2 期
A Comparative study of Ambu Aura-i and Air-Q Supraglottic airway devices as conduit for blind tracheal intubation in patients with normal airway
试验速览
- 阶段
- 1/2 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- SSG Hospital
- 入组人数
- 176
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- first attempt success rate of blind tracheal intubation through Ambu Aura-i and Air-Q supraglottic airway device
研究概览
简要总结
This study is to compare between the Ambu Aura-i and Air-Q supraglottic airway device (SAD), for use as conduit for blind tracheal intubation, in terms of ease and no. of attempts of SAD insertion, time taken for SAD insertion, ease and no. of attempts of intubation, time taken for intubation, first attempt and overall success rate of intubation, and effect on Hemodynamic parameters, when used in patients with ASA physical status I/II, with normal airway. It is a Prospective Ramdomised Clinical Study. We hypothesize that both Ambu Aura-i and Air-Q SADs are comparable in above mentioned terms.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Other
- 盲法
- Participant Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •70 kgs ASA Physical status I/II Patients posted for elective surgeries under General Anaesthesia.
排除标准
- •Patients with predicted difficult airway ( mouth opening <2.5cm, Mallampati grade III & IV, limited neck extension, cervical spine problem, h/o previous difficult tracheal intubation) Patients with recent upper respiratory tract infection Patients with any oropharyngeal pathology Patient with any known pulmonary disease (like Asthma) and cardiovascular diseases (like hypertension).
- •Obese patients with BMI >30 kg/m2 Patient with any conditions that increase the risk of gastro oesophageal regurgitation.
- •H/O allergy to Latex or to any drugs used in protocol Patients not willing for participation.
结局指标
主要结局
first attempt success rate of blind tracheal intubation through Ambu Aura-i and Air-Q supraglottic airway device
时间窗: At the end of study
次要结局
- ease of insertion of supraglottic airway device (SAD)(At the time of insertion of Supraglottic airway device)
- no. of attempts of insertion of SAD(attempts at the time of SAD insertion)
- time taken for insertion of SAD(in seconds, at the time of SAD insertion)
- no.of attempts of tracheal intubation through SAD(attempts at the time of intubation)
- time taken for tracheal intubation through SAD(in seconds, at the time of intubation)
- ease of tracheal intubation through SAD(At the time of intubation through supraglottic airway device)
- overall success rate of blind tracheal intubation through Ambu Aura-i and Air-Q(At the end of the study)
研究者
研究点 (1)
Loading locations...
相似试验
已完成
不适用
A Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare Two Supraglottic Airway Devices (Ambu AuraGain vs Air Q-3) in Terms of Performance Characteristics.NCT06914453University of Malaya90
尚未招募
1 期
A comparative study of two supraglottic airway devices for blind tracheal intubatioCTRI/2020/09/027981SSG Hospital
尚未招募
不适用
Air Q Laryngeal Airway Versus the AmbuAura Gain as a Conduit for Endotracheal IntubationDifficult IntubationNCT05607433Cairo University44
已完成
不适用
Ambu AuraGain vs LMA Supreme in Laparoscopic SurgeryLaparoscopyAirway ManagementSupraglottic Airway DevicesNCT02511652Hospital Clinic of Barcelona60
Unknown
不适用
Comparison of Air QTM Intubating Airway Versus Ambu-Aura Intubating Laryngeal MaskAirway ManagementObesityNCT04195035Cairo University40