MedPath

Trans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation (TsMS) in Parkinson's Disease- Related Musculoskeletal Pain

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Parkinson Disease
Musculoskeletal Pain
Interventions
Device: Trans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation (TsMS)
Device: Sham Trans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation (TsMS)
Registration Number
NCT04546529
Lead Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
Brief Summary

Parkinson disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disease. Pain is the frequent non-motor symptom that significantly compromises the quality of life, affecting 80% of patients during the course of the disease. There is currently no evidence-based treatment for PD-related pain in general. Nociceptive pain is the most frequent pain in PD an is frequently musculoskeletal in nature. Epidural spinal cord stimulation is known to provide analgesic effects in several types of pain syndromes. Here we test analgesic effects of a non-invasive trans-spinal magnetic stimulation as an add-on treatment for nociceptive (musculoskeletal) pain directly related to Parkinson disease.

Detailed Description

Background: pain is frequent non-motor symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD) that significantly compromises the quality of life, affecting 80% of patients during the course of the disease. Nociceptive pain is the most frequent subtype, mainly musculoskeletal in nature. There is currently no evidence-based treatment for PD-related pain in general. The present study tests the effectiveness and safety of non-invasive trans-spinal magnetic stimulation (TsMS) to treat musculoskeletal pain directly related to PD in a sham-controlled randomized approach.

Patients and Methods: this is a randomized, sham-controlled trial including 40 subjects, aged between 18 and 85 years, with musculoskeletal pain directly related to PD, that will be randomized to receive TsMS active or TsMS sham in a 1:1 ratio. Enrollment will take place at the Pain Center of the University of São Paulo and Movement Disorders Center of the University of São Paulo.

We have decided to perform an interim analysis when 24 patients will be included in the trial in order to assess safety and calculate effect size of the active intervention, after meeting with the research and statistical board. A decision will thereafter be made to, either: 1: halt the study due to futility, 2: continue the study with a new target sample size based on the calculations made with the effect from the n= 24 sample.

Expected results: the study hypothesis is that non-invasive trans-spinal magnetic stimulation is superior to sham and it is safe to use that device in patients with nociceptive (musculoskeletal) pain in PD.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
27
Inclusion Criteria
  • Parkinson disease
  • Parkinsson disease related musculoskeletal Pain
  • Signed term of informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnant or lacting women
  • Predominant neuropathic pain
  • The presence of psychiatric disorders such as uncontrolled posttraumatic stress disorder, uncontrolled depression, uncontrolled anxiety disorder and suicidal ideation;
  • Who wishes at any time to abandon the study;

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
TsMS activeTrans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation (TsMS)Patients undergoing real Trans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation (TsMS) for 8 weeks
TsMS shamSham Trans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation (TsMS)Patients undergoing placebo Trans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation (TsMS) for 8 weeks
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of respondersbase line (moment of inclusion) and the last day of the patient assessment (2x in two months)

Number of individuals presenting 50% pain intensity reduction (on VNS 0-10 average pain of BPI item 5) in the active vs the sham group at the last (8th week) assessment compared to baseline values.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsImmediately after the intervention (session of stimulation)

The safety of trans-spinal magnetic stimulation (TsMS) will be assessed by measuring the number of participants who experience serious events. Each serious adverse event be described in detail

Parkinson's disease motor symptomsbase line (moment of inclusion) and the last day of the sessions of TMS-e (2x in two months)

Assess by UPDRS part III

Moodbase line (moment of inclusion) and the last day of the sessions of TMS-e (2x in two months)

Assess mood by hospital anxiety and depression scale

Quality of life related to pain reliefbase line (moment of inclusion) and the last day of the sessions of TMS-e (2x in two months)

Assess by EuroQol- 5 Dimension

Interference in daily activitiesbase line (moment of inclusion) and the last day of the sessions of TMS-e (2x in two months)

measured by brief pain inventory

Global impression of changebase line (moment of inclusion) and the last day of the sessions of TMS-e (2x in two months)

Assess % of very much and much improved

Change in baseline of Painbase line (moment of inclusion) and in the last day after the final session of TMS-e (2x in two months)

Assessing by score derivated of Parkinson's Disease Pain Classification System (PD-PCS). This score range from 0 (minimum) to 90 (maximum), being considered an effective improvement in the patient's pain when the pain decreases at least in 50% from the basal score.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

🇧🇷

São Paulo, Brazil

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath