Transdermal Fluid Removal in Fluid Overload
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Sponsor
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
- Enrollment
- 22
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Overall Success rate (volume): the % of patients that achieved the removal >200ml of fluid transdermally in a session.
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The proposed study seeks to explore the possibility of significantly increasing the success rate (from the current rate of 28%) of clinically significant Transdermal Fluid Removal (TFR) in heart failure patients. It seeks to further understand the device and patient characteristics influencing successful clinically relevant fluid removal and to measure any patient-defined benefits. It also wishes to explore the patient experience of the removal.
Detailed Description
Fluid overload is distressing and is particularly prevalent in patients with vital organ dysfunction such as in kidney and heart disease. Due to the patient's inability to remove excess wastes and water, these accumulate in their body fluid compartments. Such excess fluid and toxins have to be removed with high dose diuretics (water tablets or injections) or by frequent dialysis. Treatment with diuretics is effective initially in some patients but is fraught with risks and side effects. The retained fluid and wastes are mainly lodged within the extracellular compartment (interstitial or tissue fluid) and exert deleterious effects on cell functions. Much of this excess fluid collects relatively superficially within the skin, especially in the lower extremities or other dependent body parts as oedema. The proposed study seeks to explore the possibility of significantly increasing the success rate (from the current rate of 28%) of clinically significant Transdermal Fluid Removal (TFR) in heart failure patients. It seeks to further understand the device and patient characteristics influencing successful clinically relevant fluid removal and to measure any patient-defined benefits. It also wishes to explore the patient experience of the removal. Principal aim of the research: To investigate whether the TFR device can remove clinically viable or relevant volumes of fluid transdermally in advanced heart failure and other patients with significant oedema. "Clinically viable" volume is defined as the removal of 200ml or more of fluid in a session of up to 10 hours (or 0.43 ml/h per 1cm2 of the skin area treated with microneedles).
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Participants aged \>18 years
- •Diagnosis of heart failure
- •Presence of visible oedema
Exclusion Criteria
- •Inability to give consent
- •Patient on warfarin or simthrome (acecoumarol) with International Normalised Ratio (INR) \>3 or other bleeding disorders
- •Extensive skin disease, infected or broken skin over intended study area
- •Pregnancy NB: Patients with pacemakers or implantable cardiac devices (ICD) may be recruited but will not have bioimpedance measurements
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Overall Success rate (volume): the % of patients that achieved the removal >200ml of fluid transdermally in a session.
Time Frame: 12 months
Primary outcome/endpoint
Secondary Outcomes
- Tolerability of TFR: N (%) in categories: "Well, very well, poorly or very poorly" tolerated.(12 months)
- Overall Success rate (flow rate): % of patients in whom >0.43 ml/h per 1cm2 was removed using either 550µm or 850µm microneedles(12 months)
- Characteristics of patients with successful versus unsuccessful TFR (e.g. demographics, extent of oedema, bioimpedance volumes, serum albumin)(12 months)
- Success rate with short (550µm) and long (850 µm) microneedles respectively: % of patients in each category in whom >200ml or >0.43 ml/h per 1cm2 was removed(12 months)
- Microneedle insertion depth/force ratio: Mean (+SD) of microneedle skin insertion depth/insertion force used per microneedle type (550 µm and 850µm)(12 months)
- Proportion of successfully penetration of microneedles per array: Tertile bands of successfully penetrated microneedle per array(12 months)
- Incidence (%) of adverse rate per event and for all events(12 months)
- Impact of the fluid extraction on routine activities including mobility, comfort, recovery experience: N (%) patients reporting "improved, no change or worsening" of each parameter.(12 months)
- Patient' views on impact, usability and potential of the TFR device: N (%) patients reporting positive, negative or neutral in each category.(12 months)