Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07469813
NCT07469813CompletedNot Applicable

Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment With an Oscillating Ultrasonic Device With Adjunctive Root Polishing. A Randomized, Comparative, Prospective Clinical Trial.

251 Hellenic Air Force & VA General Hospital1 site in 1 country40 target enrollmentStarted: June 20, 2025Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
40
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Probing Pocket Depth

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Non-surgical periodontal treatment leads to periodontal inflammation resolution and amelioration of the clinical periodontal indices via the microbial load reduction. Additionally, non-surgical periodontal treatment can be performed with different instruments. Ultrasonic scalers with or without hand scalers are more frequently used during Phase I periodontal treatment, however the one who performs the treatment is committed to choose the tools that according to his judgment will lead to the best clinical outcomes following non-surgical periodontal therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of non-surgical periodontal treatment with a new oscillating ultrasonic device (Paro) with adjunctive root polishing versus traditional scaling and root planing with ultrasonic device and hand instruments, 3 and 6 months after treatment, at patients diagnosed with chronic periodontitis stage II, III and IV.

Detailed Description

Non-surgical periodontal treatment leads to periodontal inflammation resolution and amelioration of the clinical periodontal indices via the microbial load reduction. Additionally, non-surgical periodontal treatment can be performed with different instruments. Ultrasonic scalers with or without hand scalers are more frequently used during Phase I periodontal treatment, however the one who performs the treatment is committed to choose the tools that according to his judgment will lead to the best clinical outcomes following non-surgical periodontal therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of non-surgical periodontal treatment with a new oscillating ultrasonic device (Paro) with adjunctive root polishing versus traditional scaling and root planing with ultrasonic device and hand instruments, 3 and 6 months after treatment, at patients diagnosed with chronic periodontitis stage II, III and IV.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Systematically healthy adults
  • Signed informed consent
  • Periodontal disease diagnosis
  • Absence of periodontal treatment the previous 12 months

Exclusion Criteria

  • Medical history that interferes with the healing process (CVD, organ transplantation, renal or hepatic failure etc)
  • Antibiotic and anti-inflammatory intake up to 1 month before treatment initiation
  • Pharmaceutically induced gingival enlargement
  • Pregnancy/ lactation

Arms & Interventions

Group 1

Active Comparator

Conventional Periodontal Treatment, scaling and root planing with ultrasonic device and hand instruments

Intervention: Non-surgical periodontal treatment with U/S scalers and hand instruments (Procedure)

Group 2

Experimental

Periodontal treatment with Vector/Paro

Intervention: Periodontal treatment with U/S scalers and Vector/Paro (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Probing Pocket Depth

Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of post-treatment monitoring at 6 months

Measurement from Free Gingival Margin to the base of the sulcus/pocket, in millimeters

Secondary Outcomes

  • Clinical Attachment Levels(From enrollment to the end of post-treatment monitoring at 6 months)
  • Bleeding on probing(From enrollment to the end of post-treatment monitoring at 6 months)
  • Root Dentin Hypersensitivity(From enrollment to the end of post-treatment monitoring at 6 months)
  • Pain perception after treatment(From enrollment to the end of post-treatment monitoring at 6 months)
  • Recession(From enrollment to the end of post-treatment monitoring at 6 months)

Investigators

Sponsor
251 Hellenic Air Force & VA General Hospital
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials