Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02700061
NCT02700061
Unknown
Phase 2

Effects of Upper Limb Motor Training and Upper Limb Robotic Training Over Neuroplasticity and Function Capacity: A Single-blind Randomized Clinical Trial With Patients With Stroke Sequelae

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital1 site in 1 country51 target enrollmentFebruary 2012
ConditionsStroke

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Stroke
Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Enrollment
51
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change on Motor Function assessed by Wolf Motor Function scale
Last Updated
10 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects of upper limb training with Induced Constraint Therapy (ICT) or robotic therapy. No placebo therapy is used. Motor function, neurological evaluations and quality of life are assessed for the comparison of the therapies.

Detailed Description

The trial is being carried out in the Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation of the University of São Paulo since February 2012. The investigators are including patients with clinical diagnosis of Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. The patients are being randomized in blocks of four, six and eight, in two arms: ICT: patients are undergoing 60 minutes physiotherapy and occupational therapy twice a week for ten consecutive weeks. Other therapeutic services as phonoaudiology, psychology, nutrition, physical conditioning are prescribed upon the patients' medical demands. After the 10 weeks, the patients are undergoing two whole weeks of daily ICT as to reach 90% of the time under constraint, including weekends. During this last period, no other therapeutic service is offered, but the occupational therapy under ICT. Patients are not allowed to undergo robotic therapy. Robotic therapy: patients are undergoing robotic occupational therapy for 60 minutes, three times a week for twelve consecutive weeks. All other therapeutic services are prescribed upon the patients' medical demands. Patients are not allowed to undergo ICT. The investigator and the raters are blind to treatment. The evaluations are done prior to the beginning of the treatment and at the end of it. The follow up assessments are done at 3 and 12 months after the end of the treatment. The sample size was estimated to be 62 patients in each arm, a total size of 124 patients

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
February 2012
End Date
February 2017
Last Updated
10 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of stroke;
  • Patients from 6 months after stroke up to 36 months after stroke;
  • Clinically stable;
  • Upper limb Brunnstrom scale III or IV;
  • Brunnstrom scale above V if clinician supports patients will benefit from treatment;
  • Minimum wrist extension of 20°, and minimum of 10° of metacarpophalangeal active extension.
  • Signed Informed Consent Form;

Exclusion Criteria

  • Mini-Mental score lower than 20 points;
  • Previous multiple strokes;
  • Bone diseases and articulation injuries ;
  • Presence of psychological disturbances capable of diminishing adherence;
  • Articulation pain within the range of motion proposed by the therapies;
  • Participation in another study protocol for upper limbs therapies.
  • Previous treatment with robotic assisted therapies.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change on Motor Function assessed by Wolf Motor Function scale

Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Change from baseline in Wolf Motor Function scale.

Change on Motor Function assessed by Fugl Meyer scale

Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Change from baseline in Fugl Meyer scale.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change on Motor Function assessed by Wolf Motor Function scale(Baseline, 3 months and 12 months)
  • Change on Motor Function assessed by Fugl Meyer scale(Baseline, 3 months and 12 months)
  • Change on Motor Function assessed by Robotic scale(Baseline, 3 months and 12 months)
  • Change on Function ability and quality of movement assessed by Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT)(Baseline, 12 weeks, 3 months and 12 months)
  • Change on Functional Independence Measure (FIM) as assessed by FIM scale(Baseline, 12 weeks, 3 months and 12 months)
  • Change on Quality of life assessed by Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)(Baseline, 12 weeks, 3 months and 12 months)
  • Change on Kinematic variables assessed by InMotion robots(Baseline, 12 weeks, 3 months and 12 months)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials