Effect of Different Form of Upper Limb Muscles Training on Dyspnea in COPD
- Conditions
- COPD
- Interventions
- Other: Strength trainingOther: Endurance training
- Registration Number
- NCT03611036
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Brest
- Brief Summary
Evaluate the effect of upper limbs strength training versus the effect of upper limbs endurance training, on dyspnea, in patients with COPD during a pulmonary rehabilitation program.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 280
- Patient with stage 2 to 4 (A to D) COPD admitted to a pulmonary rehabilitation program (4 weeks)
- Patient aged 18 or over
- Patient able to consent and having signed a consent form
- Patient with pain, osteoarthritis or shoulder surgery
- Patient with a history of Pneumonectomy, lobectomy less than 6 months old
- Refusal of participation
- Patient with an inability to complete a pulmonary rehabilitation program in totality
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
- Patient under tutorship or curatorship
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Strength Strength training Patients will follow the pulmonary rehabilitation program associated with upper limbs strength training for a duration of 4 weeks Endurance Endurance training Patients will follow the pulmonary rehabilitation program associated with upper limbs endurance training for a duration of 4 weeks
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Compare the effect of upper limbs strength training versus the effect of upper limb endurance training on dyspnea in patients with COPD during a pulmonary rehabilitation program. Change from inclusion at 4 week Measurement of dyspnea using the London Chest Daily Activity Living (LCADL) questionnaire.
This 15-item, self-administered questionnaire allows an evaluation of dyspnea in patients with COPD during daily activities divided into four components: self-care, domestic, physical, and leisure. Patients could score from 0: "I would not do anyway" to 5: "I need someone else to do this". LCADL score is calculated by aggregating the points assigned to each question, with a higher score representing maximal disability.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Compare the evolution of upper limb strength between the 2 groups. At inclusion and week 4 Measurement of the strength of deltoids, biceps and brachial triceps, with hand held dynamometer
Compare dyspnea in daily life between the 2 groups At inclusion and week 4 Measurement of dyspnea using Dyspnea-12 questionnaire. This 12-item self-administered questionnaire measures dyspnea severity in both its physical and affective components, independently from activity limitation. Patients score ranges from "none" (corresponding to score 0) to "severe" (score 3). Dyspnea-12 score is calculated by aggregating the points assigned to each question; the higher the score, the greater the severity.
Measuring upper limb endurance At inclusion and week 4 with the 6-minute Peg Board and Ring Test (6PBRT)
Compare upper limbs muscle fatigue at the end of a functional test using the upper limbs At inclusion and week 4 Measurement of upper limbs muscle fatigue with Borg scale at the end of 6PBRT. The measure is a rating on a scale from 0 to 10 attached to different words of appreciation: "very light, difficult, painful ..." effort.
Compare dyspnea at the end of a functional test using the upper limbs At inclusion and week 4 Measurement of dyspnea with Borg scale at the end of 6PBRT. The measure is a rating on a scale from 0 to 10 attached to different words of appreciation: "very light, difficult, painful ..." effort.
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
CHRU de Brest
🇫🇷Brest, France
CH Pays de Morlaix
🇫🇷Morlaix, France