跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04355754
NCT04355754Unknown不适用

Assesment of Usefulness of Ventil Device for Mechanical Ventilation in ICU Patients

Medical University of Gdansk2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 40 人开始时间: 2020年4月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
40
试验地点
2
主要终点
Number of cases in which it was necessary to stop using Ventil and to step- back to ventilation without this flow divider

研究概览

简要总结

During Covid-19 pandemic many patients require mechanical ventilation due to disastrous impact of SARS-CoV-2 on lungs. In several countries there is a shortage of ICU beds and ventilators. Critically ill patients are treated outside ICUs. Doctors are facing ethical dilemmas who they should treat with ventilation, who should receive ventilator and who should but will not. In ICUs or step down units or in nursery homes there are also patients beyond hope treated - very often they are dependent on mechanical ventilation. Some attempts to invent a device that could replace complex machines in patients with anticipated poor outcome have been made. Ventil was used in clinical scenarios for separate lung ventilation with good effect. As a flow divider it has a potential to ventilate 2 patients at the same time. In the study Ventil will ventilate one patient and instead of the second there will be an artificial lung. Tidal volumes, minute ventilation, PEEP set and final will be checked. Ppeak, Pmean, Pplat, Cdyn, airway resistance, EtCO2, Sat O2, HR, SAP, DAP will be monitored every 2 hrs, as well as blood-gas analysis (every 8 hrs).

详细描述

During Covid-19 pandemic many patients require mechanical ventilation due to disastrous impact of SARS-CoV-2 on lungs. In several countries there is a shortage of ICU beds and ventilators. Critically ill patients are treated outside ICUs. Doctors are facing ethical dilemmas who they should treat with ventilation, who should receive ventilator and who should but will not.

Before pandemic in ICUs there had always been patients who required mechanical ventilation because of extrapulmonary reasons as well as palliative cases or those in vegetative condition. Most of these patients require just a simple ventilator, not a sophisticated mode of ventilation. Some attempts to invent a device that could replace complex machines in patients with anticipated poor outcome have been made. Ventil was used in clinical scenarios for separate lung ventilation with good effect. VENTIL device, a flow divider, theoretically allows for independent, fully automated synchronous ventilation of 2 patients with use of only one respirator. In the shortage of respirators (ex. terrorist attack, natural disasters) device allows also to ventilate in classical system two patients using single respirator.

Ventil - independent lung ventilation system was constructed by engineers from Nalecz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering of Polish Academy of Science. Ventil was tested in the clinical scenario - it's safety had been confirmed. Several years ago the working prototypes of the device, after approval of Ethical Committee, was tested in about 150 patients, who were ventilated with independent synchronous lung ventilation and had been found useful.

The idea of the study is to check the usefulness of the device (modern version) in ICU patients who can be ventilated with volume -controlled mode of ventilation as an attempt to use single device for ventilation of 2 patients. At this moment, according to several scientific societies, sharing mechanical ventilators should not be attempted because it cannot be done safely with current equipment. However, it is possible that using a designed flow divider will allow safe ventilation in patients without needs for complicated modes of ventilation. Then maybe it will be possible to release some ventilators and to use them in patients in severe condition, mainly in the era of extreme ventilator shortage. In the study Ventil will ventilate one patient and instead of the second, there will be an artificial lung. Tidal volumes, minute ventilation, PEEP set and final will be checked. Ppeak, Pmean, Pplat, Cdyn, airway resistance, EtCO2, Sat O2, HR, SAP, DAP will be monitored (every 2 hrs), as well as blood-gas analysis (every 8 hrs)

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • ICU patients who require mechanical ventilation

排除标准

  • Patients who require complex modes of ventilation will not be recruited
  • The sudy in an individual patient be discontinued if case of:
  • Respiratory Criteria:
  • episodes of desaturation <90% (in pts without COPD) without reversibel reason
  • need for FiO2 increase by 10%
  • need for switch to other than CMV mode of ventillation
  • need for neuromucular blockade or for deepen sedation because of assynchrony between patient and venilator
  • cummulation of CO2>45 mm Hg (in pts without COPD) not responding to the increase of minute ventilation for 30 minutes
  • Pplat >30 cmH2O
  • Circulatory criteria:
  • New haemodynamic disturbances that cannot be explaned by other reasons
  • ↑ or ↓of BP by 20%
  • ↑ or ↓of HR by 20%
  • clinically important heart rhythm disturbances

结局指标

主要结局

Number of cases in which it was necessary to stop using Ventil and to step- back to ventilation without this flow divider

时间窗: 48 hours

Ventil will be removed from the patient-ventilator circiuit in case of episodes of desaturation \<90% (in pts without COPD) without reversibel reason; need for FiO2 increase by 10%; need for switch to other than CMV mode of ventillation need for neuromucular blockade or for deepen sedation because of assynchrony between patient and venilator cummulation of CO2\>45 mm Hg (in pts without COPD) not responding to the increase of minute ventilation for 30 minutes; if Pplat \>30 cmH2O; in case of new haemodynamic disturbances that cannot be explaned by other reasons; in case of increase or decrease of BP by 20%; increase or decrease of HR by 20%; in case of occurence of clinically important heart rhythm disturbances

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Radoslaw Owczuk

full professor

Medical University of Gdansk

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验