Comparison of Ambu Auragain and LMA Proseal in patients posted for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/09/036307
- Lead Sponsor
- Government Medical College Bhavnagar
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
(1)Mouth opening <2 cm
(2)Mallampati class 4
(3)Body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2
(4)Upper respiratory tract infection
(5)Increased risk of aspiration (not adequate NBM,
Gastro oesophageal reflex disorder, hiatus
hernia and pregnancy)
(6)Need for high airway pressure (COPD patients, Asthma)
(7)Cervical spine fracture or instability
(8)History of allergy to one or more drugs and latex
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare Ambu Auragain & LMA Proseal in terms of no. of attempts required, time required for insertion, manipulation required after insertion, failed insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, mean tidal expiratory volumeTimepoint: 2-4 hours
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare Ambu Auragain & LMA Proseal and in terms of <br/ ><br>hemodynamic response in terms of Heart Rate (HR) & Mean Arteria Pressure (MAP) during insertion of SGA devices, <br/ ><br>ease of insertion of gastric tube through SGA devices, <br/ ><br>To compare complications like blood staining after removal, oropharyngeal painTimepoint: 24 hours