To compare the effectiveness of two different types of tubes
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/01/048788
- Lead Sponsor
- S M Kushal
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
·Age 18 to 60 years
·ASA 1 and 2
Exclusion Criteria
·Younger than 18 years old
·American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status IV or V
· Diagnosed with respiratory tract pathology or coagulation disorders requiring a nasal route for tracheal intubation
·Those at risk of regurgitationâ??aspiration (previous upper gastrointestinal tract surgery, known hiatus hernia, esophageal reflux, peptic ulceration, or not fasted).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1) To evaluate the effectiveness of intubation with Fastrach TM LMA and Ambu aura-i in Anticipated Difficult Airway Management <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>2) To evaluate the time taken and number of attempts for intubation with FastrachTM and Ambu Aura-i in Anticipated Difficult Airway Management. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 18 months <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method FastrachTM intubating LMA is better than Ambu aura-i LMATimepoint: 18 months