MedPath

Evaluation of Safety and Activity of Celaderm in Healing Venous Leg Ulcers

Phase 1
Completed
Conditions
Varicose Ulcer
Leg Ulcer
Interventions
Device: Celaderm (Frozen Cultured Epidermal Allograft)
Device: Control (compression bandaging)
Registration Number
NCT00399308
Lead Sponsor
Shire
Brief Summary

This pilot study was designed to test the safety of Celaderm(TM) in treating venous leg ulcers and to give preliminary information about the efficacy of two different Celaderm(TM) dosing regimens.

Detailed Description

Celaderm(TM) weekly for four weeks or biweekly for four treatments combined with Profore(R) compression vs. Profore(R) compression alone.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • venous ulcer > 1 month and < 12 months in duration; 2 to 20 sq cm in surface area; not infected
  • confirmatory venous ultrasound showing prior DVT and concurrent venous reflux
  • ankle-brachial index 0.80 or greater
Exclusion Criteria
  • cutaneous malignancy
  • recent treatment with corticosteroids or chemotherapeutic agents
  • wound exposed bone, tendon or neurovascular structure
  • wound infected and requiring antibiotics

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Celaderm, Bi-WeeklyCeladerm (Frozen Cultured Epidermal Allograft)Celaderm, bi-weekly applications, up to a maximum of four applications
Celaderm, WeeklyCeladerm (Frozen Cultured Epidermal Allograft)Celaderm, applied weekly, up to a maximum of four applications
ControlControl (compression bandaging)Multi-layer compression bandaging (Profore)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Primary Efficacy: Cumulative Proportion of Patients Completely Healed by the End of the Treatment Period, as Judged by the Investigator's Direct Observation.12 weeks

The primary efficacy observation was the proportion of wounds that achieved complete wound closure after 12 weeks of active treatment (i.e. of of Week 15 including screening/wash-in phase.)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Secondary Efficacy: Proportion of Patients Achieving 90% Re-epithelialization After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment.12 Weeks

Re-epithelialization was judged by the Medical Monitor based upon computerized planimetry of serial wound photographs.

Secondary Efficacy: Cumulative Proportion of Patients Completely Healed by the End of the Follow-up Period (24 Weeks).24 weeks

The proportion of patients achieving wound closure by the end of the study follow-up period, 90 days after the end of the active treatment period.

Secondary Efficacy: Durability of Wound Closure Through 12 Weeks After the End of the Treatment Period.Variable - minimum of 12 weeks of follow-up.

The proportion of patients who had a recurrence of the study ulcer during follow-up after achieving wound closure during the active treatment period.

Trial Locations

Locations (9)

Center for Curative & Palliative Wound Care, Calvary Hospital

🇺🇸

Bronx, New York, United States

National Center for Limb Preservation

🇺🇸

Niles, Illinois, United States

Blair Medical Associates, Inc., Station Medical Center, Associates Wound Clinic

🇺🇸

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Dixie Regional Medical Center, Wound Care

🇺🇸

Saint George, Utah, United States

State University of New York Stony Brook

🇺🇸

Stony Brook, New York, United States

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Division of Vascular Surgery

🇺🇸

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Peripheral Vascular Associates, P.A.

🇺🇸

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Division of Podiatry

🇺🇸

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Dr. Robert Snyder

🇺🇸

Tamarac, Florida, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath