MedPath

An Implementation Strategy for the Adoption of an Evidence-Based Guideline for Pit-and-Fissure Sealants

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Pit-and-Fissure Sealants
Interventions
Behavioral: Deliberative Loop
Registration Number
NCT04682730
Lead Sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Brief Summary

The purpose of this implementation science study is to determine whether Deliberative Loops are effective in increasing providers' adherence to the non-cavitated caries component of the American Dental Association's pit-and-fissure sealant evidence-based clinical practice guideline. The investigators use a stepped wedge design to randomly assign dental clinics to the Deliberative Loop intervention. In a Deliberative Loop, stakeholders receive background information, participate in a facilitated discussion, and share their views with leadership. The Deliberative Loop intervention is designed to help stakeholders form informed opinions; in this study, stakeholders will be forming informed opinions about the implementation interventions they think will increase their clinic's adherence to the guideline. The investigators hypothesize that compared with the pre-intervention period, following the intervention, providers will place or treatment plan sealants for significantly more occlusal non-cavitated carious lesions.

Detailed Description

The purpose of this implementation science study is to determine whether Deliberative Loops are effective in increasing providers' adherence to the non-cavitated caries component of the American Dental Association's pit-and-fissure sealant evidence-based clinical practice guideline. The investigators use a stepped wedge design to randomly assign dental clinics to the Deliberative Loop intervention. In a Deliberative Loop, stakeholders receive background information, participate in a facilitated discussion, and share their views with leadership. The Deliberative Loop intervention is designed to help stakeholders form informed opinions; in this study, stakeholders will be forming informed opinions about the implementation interventions they think will increase their clinic's adherence to the guideline. The investigators hypothesize that compared with the pre-intervention period, following the intervention, providers will place or treatment plan sealants for significantly more occlusal non-cavitated carious lesions (NCCL).

All persons employed by Kaiser Permanente Northwest or Permanente Dental Associates and who work in a Kaiser Permanente Northwest dental clinic at any level \[e.g., part time, full time\] will be eligible to participate in the study. This includes both service providers and front-of-the-house staff, approximately 1,200 employees.

This is a Stage III study.

Participating sites include the 16 general dental clinics of Kaiser Permanente Northwest. All clinics are located within the United States.

The estimated time from when the study opens to enrollment until completion of data collection is 16 months. It will take approximately one to two months for each individual participant to complete all study-related tasks, depending on how soon after the introductory session the Deliberative session can be scheduled.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
896
Inclusion Criteria
  • Employed by Kaiser Permanente Northwest Dental or Permanente Dental Associates
  • Work in a Kaiser Permanente Northwest dental clinic
Exclusion Criteria
  • none

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SEQUENTIAL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Deliberative LoopDeliberative Loop28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Providers' Rates of Placing or Treatment Planning Sealants for Occlusal NCCLsfrom one month before the first step to two months after the final step, 1 year.

The change in the providers' rates of placing or treatment planning sealants for occlusal NCCLs from before to after clinic stakeholders are exposed to the Deliberative Loop intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Total Program Costsfrom planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 year

Program costs: Total intervention costs. Program cost analysis conducted for the Deliberative Loop (DL) intervention using an opportunity cost approach. Program costs were estimated for the DL intervention (Workbook development - including the guideline, EHR data analyses, initial practitioner survey, and evidence review - and printing; Online DL session facilitator training and delivery, and program tailoring; dental office staff time; costs for implemented strategies, if applicable; and allowed charges for dental sealant placements). All costs are reported in 2021 dollars. The study analysis period was Jan 1-Dec 31, 2021, and in 16 clinics during 2021.

Cost Per Clinicfrom planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 year

Program costs: Cost per clinic

Cost Per Member Per Month (PMPM)from planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 year

Total intervention costs per member per month. Program cost analysis conducted for the Deliberative Loop (DL) intervention using an opportunity cost approach. Program costs were estimated for the DL intervention (Workbook development - including the guideline, EHR data analyses, initial practitioner survey, and evidence review - and printing; Online DL session facilitator training and delivery, and program tailoring; dental office staff time; costs for implemented strategies, if applicable; and allowed charges for dental sealant placements). All costs are reported in 2021 dollars. The study analysis period was Jan 1-Dec 31, 2021, and in 16 clinics during 2021. There were 265,200 members age 6 years or more on January 1, 2021, or a total of 3,182,400 member months.

Annualized Costs for Guideline Implementation Interventionsfrom planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 year

Program costs: Annualized costs for guideline implementation interventions

NCCL Treatment Costs- Total Program Costs Per Sealantfrom planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 year

Total intervention costs per sealant. Program cost analysis conducted for the Deliberative Loop (DL) intervention using an opportunity cost approach. Program costs were estimated for the DL intervention (Workbook development - including the guideline, EHR data analyses, initial practitioner survey, and evidence review - and printing; Online DL session facilitator training and delivery, and program tailoring; dental office staff time; costs for implemented strategies, if applicable; and allowed charges for dental sealant placements). All costs are reported in 2021 dollars. The study analysis period was Jan 1-Dec 31, 2021, and in 16 clinics during 2021. There were 95 sealants placed during the intervention period at 16 clinics.

NCCL Treatment Costs- Total Program Costs Per Sealant Per Clinicfrom planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 year

Program costs: NCCL treatment costs- Total program costs per sealant per clinic

NCCL Treatment Costs- Per Sealant Per Member Per Month (PMPM)from planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 year

Total intervention costs per sealant per member per month. Program cost analysis conducted for the Deliberative Loop (DL) intervention using an opportunity cost approach. Program costs were estimated for the DL intervention (Workbook development - including the guideline, EHR data analyses, initial practitioner survey, and evidence review - and printing; Online DL session facilitator training and delivery, and program tailoring; dental office staff time; costs for implemented strategies, if applicable; and allowed charges for dental sealant placements). All costs are reported in 2021 dollars. The study analysis period was Jan 1-Dec 31, 2021, and in 16 clinics during 2021. There were 95 sealants placed during the intervention period at 16 clinics. There were 265,200 members age 6 years or more on January 1, 2021, or a total of 3,182,400 member months.

Sealant Treatment Plan Resolutionwhen a clinic was exposed to the intervention (when they received their survey results) to December 31, 2021. (Vanguard- 9.34 months; Cluster 1- 7.84 months; Cluster 2- 6.39 months; Cluster 3- 5.30 months; Cluster 4- 3.33 months; Cluster 5- 2.75 months)

The count of occlusal NCCLs with a treatment plan for sealants that is sealed by the end of the post-intervention evaluation period.

Cost Effectivenessfrom one month before the first step to two months after the final step, 1 year

Estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for clinics after exposure to the intervention. ICERs calculated for annualized total costs, costs per clinic, and costs PMPM.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research

🇺🇸

Portland, Oregon, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath