TCTR20171127002招募中3 期
PROPOFOL VERSUS MIDAZOLAM FOR CONSCIOUS SEDATION ADMINISTERED BY THE NURSE UNDER ENDOSCOPIST’S SUPERVISION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY: THE IMPACT ON ENDOSCOPY UNIT EFFICIENCY
/A0 个研究点目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2017年11月27日最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 200
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 85 Years（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy with ASA class I-II and no severe comorbidity
排除标准
- •Severe comorbidity
- •ASA class III-IV
- •Pregnancy and Lactating woman
研究者
相似试验
进行中（未招募）
1 期
Sedation With Propofol or Midazolam/Fentanyl by endoscopy nurses for endoscopic examination of the lungs.A clinical randomized trial on safety and satisfactioSatisfaction and safety of propofol sedation during flexible bronchoscopy in patients undergoing endoscopic pulmonary investigation.MedDRA version: 17.1Level: LLTClassification code 10049683Term: Monitored anesthesia care sedationSystem Organ Class: 100000004865EUCTR2013-004358-12-DKGentofte Hospital, Dep. of Medicine
已完成
不适用
Propofol versus Midazolam for Procedural Sedation of Anterior Shoulder DislocatioDislocation of shoulder joint.Contusion of shoulder and upper armIRCT201501236238N2Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences48
已完成
不适用
Propofol versus midazolam/hydrocodone for sedation in flexible bronchoscopy: Safety and patient comfort - a non-inferiority trialSedation for flexible bronchoscopyRespiratoryISRCTN99754241niversity Hospital Basel (Switzerland)200
已完成
不适用
SCH-01-2014FinishedJPRN-UMIN000025385Soonchunhyang University100
已完成
不适用
Evaluation of sedation with propofol versus midazolam for endoscopic injection sclerotherapy in patients with liver cirrhosis: Randomized controlled trial.Esophageal varixJPRN-UMIN000017173Department of Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University Hospital20