Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/ISRCTN99754241
ISRCTN99754241
Completed
Not Applicable

Propofol versus midazolam/hydrocodone for sedation in flexible bronchoscopy: Safety and patient comfort - a non-inferiority trial

niversity Hospital Basel (Switzerland)0 sites200 target enrollmentFebruary 14, 2008
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsSedation for flexible bronchoscopyRespiratory

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Sedation for flexible bronchoscopy
Sponsor
niversity Hospital Basel (Switzerland)
Enrollment
200
Status
Completed
Last Updated
11 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
February 14, 2008
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
niversity Hospital Basel (Switzerland)

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •1\. Age \>18 years
  • •2\. Need for flexible bronchoscopy

Exclusion Criteria

  • •1\. Invasive mechanical ventilation
  • •2\. Known allergy or intolerance to midazolam, hydrocodone or propofol
  • •3\. Inability to provide informed consent

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Completed
Not Applicable
Propofol versus Midazolam for Procedural Sedation of Anterior Shoulder DislocatioDislocation of shoulder joint.Contusion of shoulder and upper arm
IRCT201501236238N2Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences48
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Sedation With Propofol or Midazolam/Fentanyl by endoscopy nurses for endoscopic examination of the lungs.A clinical randomized trial on safety and satisfactioSatisfaction and safety of propofol sedation during flexible bronchoscopy in patients undergoing endoscopic pulmonary investigation.MedDRA version: 17.1Level: LLTClassification code 10049683Term: Monitored anesthesia care sedationSystem Organ Class: 100000004865Therapeutic area: Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment [E] - Anesthesia and Analgesia [E03]
EUCTR2013-004358-12-DKGentofte Hospital, Dep. of Medicine
Completed
Not Applicable
Evaluation of sedation with propofol versus midazolam for endoscopic injection sclerotherapy in patients with liver cirrhosis: Randomized controlled trial.Esophageal varix
JPRN-UMIN000017173Department of Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University Hospital20
Completed
Not Applicable
Propofol versus Propofol plus Hydrocodone sedation in flexible bronchoscopySedation for flexible bronchoscopySurgery
ISRCTN81533083niversity Hospital Basel (Switzerland)300
Recruiting
Phase 3
PROPOFOL VERSUS MIDAZOLAM FOR CONSCIOUS SEDATION ADMINISTERED BY THE NURSE UNDER ENDOSCOPIST’S SUPERVISION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY: THE IMPACT ON ENDOSCOPY UNIT EFFICIENCY
TCTR20171127002/A200