MedPath

A Study to Learn How Safe and How Well Linvoseltamab Works Compared to Standard Treatment in Adult Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Are Not Eligible for Transplant

Phase 3
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Multiple Myeloma
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT06932562
Lead Sponsor
European Myeloma Network B.V.
Brief Summary

This study is researching an experimental drug called linvoseltamab. The study is focused on participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (transplant-ineligible).

The main purpose of this study is to compare the effect and safety of linvoseltamab with the effect and safety of the standard treatment.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1000
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Participants must have confirmed diagnosis of symptomatic MM per IMWG criteria.
  2. Participants must not be considered a candidate for high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) and ASCT, as described in the protocol.
  3. Participants must have measurable disease as defined in the protocol.
  4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2.
  5. Participants must have clinical laboratory values within a prespecified range.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. International Myeloma Working Group Frailty Index of 2 with the exception of participants who have a score of 2 based on age alone.

  2. Participants who defer transplant due to personal preference.

  3. Participants with non-secretory MM, active plasma cell leukemia, known light-chain (AL) amyloidosis in the presence of a concurrent diagnosis of myeloma, any other form of amyloidosis, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, or known POEMS syndrome.

  4. Any prior therapy for monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), or MM, with the exception of:

    • focal radiation and/or
    • a short course of corticosteroids as defined in the protocol.
  5. Participants who have received or are receiving any investigational agent or cell therapy with known or suspected activity against MM

  6. Participants who have known central nervous system (CNS) or meningeal involvement with MM or known or suspected progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a history of a neurocognitive condition or CNS movement disorder, OR a history of seizure, transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke or seizure within 12 months prior to study C1D1.

  7. Participants who have uncontrolled intercurrent illness.

  8. Known contraindications to the use of daratumumab or lenalidomide per local prescribing information.

  9. History of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or solid organ transplant at any time.

NOTE Other protocol defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Control arm DRdDaratumumab-
Control arm DRdLenalidomide-
Control arm DRdDexamethasone-
Experimental Arm DRd+ linvolsetamabLinvoseltamab-
Experimental Arm DRd+ linvolsetamabDaratumumab-
Experimental Arm DRd+ linvolsetamabLenalidomide-
Experimental Arm DRd+ linvolsetamabDexamethasone-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)up to 11 years

Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negative Complete Remission (CR) status at 10\^-5 per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria

MRD negative CR status by BICRup to 11 years

MRD negative CR status at 10\^-5 as determined by the Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)

Progression Free Survival (PFS) per IMWG criteriaup to 11 years

defined as the time from the date of randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier, where disease progression is determined per IMWG criteria.

PFS as determined by BICRup to 11 years

defined as the time from the date of randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier, where disease progression is determined per by BICR.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Overall Survival (OS)up to 11 years

Overall Survival (OS), measured from the date of from randomization to the date the subject's death

OR of Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)up to 11 years

To compare the proportion of patients who achieve an objective response per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria between the two study arms for VGPR or better

OR of Partial Response (PR)up to 11 years

To compare the proportion of patients who achieve an objective response per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria between the two study arms for PR or better

Objective Response (OR) of Complete Response (CR)up to 11 years

To compare the proportion of patients who achieve an objective response per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria between the two study arms for Complete Response (CR) or better

Sustained MRDup to 11 years

Sustained MRD negative CR (sMRD) at 10\^-5 per IMWG criteria

Duration of response (DOR) of stringent (s)CRup to 11 years

duration of response to best overall response of stringent sCR, per IMWG response criteria

Duration of response (DOR) of CRup to 11 years

duration of response to best overall response of CR, per IMWG response criteria

Duration of response (DOR) of VGPRup to 11 years

duration of response to best overall response of VGPR, per IMWG response criteria

Duration of response (DOR) of PRup to 11 years

duration of response to best overall response of PR, per IMWG response criteria

Time to response ≥CRup to 11 years

Time from randomization to objective response (≥CR) as per IMWG response criteria

Time to response ≥VGPRup to 11 years

Time from randomization to objective response (≥VGPR) as per IMWG response criteria

Time to response ≥PRup to 11 years

Time from randomization to objective response (≥PR) as per IMWG response criteria

Disease progressionup to 11 years

Time to disease progression per IMWG response criteria

Incidence of TEAEsup to 11 years

Incidence of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs)

Severity of TEAEsup to 11 years

Severity of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs)

Serious Adverse Eventsup to 11 years

Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

Concentrations of linvoseltamabup to 11 years

Concentrations of linvoseltamab in serum over time

Incidence antidrug antibodiesup to 11 years

Incidence of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) to linvoseltamab

Titer of ADAup to 11 years

Titer of ADA to linvoseltamab

EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status / Quality of Lifeup to 11 years

Change in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item validated questionnaire developed to measure patient-reported quality of life using one global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL) scale, 5 functioning scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social) ranging from from 1 = "very poor" to 7 = "excellent" and 9 symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties) among patients with cancer, ranging from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much" higher scores indicate higher symptom burden.

EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning (PF)up to 11 years

Change in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire functioning scale Physical Functioning (PF). PF scale consist of 5 items, ranging from from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much" higher scores indicate higher ("better") level of functioning

EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning (RF)up to 11 years

Change in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire functioning scale Role Functioning (RF). RF scale consist of 2 items, ranging from from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much" higher scores indicate higher ("better") level of functioning

EORTC QLQ-C30 Painup to 11 years

Change in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire symptom scale Pain. Pain scale consist of 2 items, ranging from from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much" higher scores indicate higher symptom burden

EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigueup to 11 years

Change in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire symptom scale Fatigue. Fatigue scale consist of 3 items, ranging from from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much" higher scores indicate higher symptom burden

EQ-5D-5L VASup to 11 years

Change in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions, 5-level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Score (VAS) (EQ-5D-5L VAS).

The EQ-5D-5L is a generic questionnaire that measures Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) across 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) across 5 levels (1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= some problems, 4= severe problems and 5= extreme problems), higher scores indicate lower health states And a visual analogue scale (VAS). VAS scale ranging from 0 = "worst" to 100 = "best" higher score indicate higher health status

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath