Spontaneous Retinal Artery Pulses (SPARs) as a Prognostic Determinant of Central Retinal Vein Occlusions (CRVO) in Patients With or Without Intravitreal Aflibercept Injections
- Conditions
- Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- Interventions
- Other: Ophthalmologic exam at inclusion and 12 months after CRVODrug: Treatment standardization with aflibercept
- Registration Number
- NCT04793100
- Lead Sponsor
- Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild
- Brief Summary
Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) is the second most common retinal vascular disease after diabetic retinopathy. It induces circulatory slowdown and blood stasis, which can appear as retinal hemorrhages. CRVO has been classically separated into two clinical forms: ischemic CVRO (possibly associated with cotton wool spots) and non-ischemic CRVO, the former being considered the most serious due to neovascular complications. More recently, a new classification has been suggested by Pierru et al. distinguishing two types of CRVO: type A characterized by low acute blood flow and type B with a slower onset. Type A is particularly associated with younger age, the presence of acute paracentral middle maculopathy, concomitant cilioretinal artery occlusion, and/or pulsatile arterial filling. Type B is more likely to occur in elderly patients, usually with high blood pressure, and multiple hemorrhages are frequently found on fundus examination.
A retrospective study had shown a slight difference in favor of pulsatile CRVO in terms of the number of intravitreal anti-angiogenic injections required to treat macular edema and visual acuity changes. However, no statistically significant difference was observed.
The objective of this study is to prospectively investigate whether spontaneous retinal artery pulses (SPARs) in patients with type A or B CRVO can be considered as a prognostic factor for the evolution of CRVO.
- Detailed Description
In order to be able to interpret the results on a homogeneous population, given that several molecules have marketing authorization for the management of macular edema following a CRVO, the therapeutic management will be standardized by the use of aflibercept for patients requiring intravitreal injection, aflibercept being the most widely referenced treatment currently used in the participating centers.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- Diagnosis of CRVO, with or without macular edema.
- Onset of symptoms in the previous month (maximum 30 days prior to inclusion)
- Naive of intravitreal injection and intravitreal corticosteroid implant
- If woman of childbearing age: commitment to effective contraception during treatment with aflibercept and for at least 3 months after the last intravitreal injection of aflibercept
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
- History of stroke or myocardial infarction in the last 3 months
- Retinal detachment or untreated retinal dehiscence
- Opacity of ocular media
- Amblyopia
- Diabetic retinopathy
- Macular edema of a different etiology than CRVO
- Active or suspected ocular or periocular infection
- Severe intraocular inflammation
- Hypersensitivity to EYLEA® : to the active substance (aflibercept) or to one of the excipients
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Follow-up for 1 year Ophthalmologic exam at inclusion and 12 months after CRVO - Follow-up for 1 year Treatment standardization with aflibercept -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in visual acuity between inclusion and visit at one year compared between patients with SPARs versus without SPARs At inclusion and 12 months after CRVO Evolution of best corrected visual acuity on ETDRS scale (Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study scale) in letters read and validated Infrared movies will be made at inclusion from the Heidelberg Spectralis device. Two ophthalmologists blinded to each other will view the films. The arterial pulses are visualized at the optic disc site in the form of pulse-dependent beats of the arterial walls. For each movie each ophthalmologist will give his assessment: SPARs+ or SPARs-. In case of discrepancy, a third ophthalmological opinion will be requested.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
Hôpital Fondation A. de Rothschuld
🇫🇷Paris, France
Centre médical et chirurgical de la rétine Strasbourg
🇫🇷Strasbourg, France
Centre Pôle Vision du Val d'ouest, Lyon
🇫🇷Écully, France