Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01385111
NCT01385111
Completed
Not Applicable

Combined Application of EBUS-TBNA and EUS-B-FNA in Mediastinal Staging of Lung Cancer; EBUS-TBNA Centered Procedure vs. EUS-B-FNA Centered Procedure, a Randomized Study.

National Cancer Center, Korea1 site in 1 country162 target enrollmentJune 2011

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Sponsor
National Cancer Center, Korea
Enrollment
162
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Diagnostic accuracy
Status
Completed
Last Updated
13 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This study aims to investigate a diagnostic yield and performance characteristics according to the order of endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-with bronchoscope-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) in the mediastinal staging of potentially operable lung cancer. EUS-FNA is a better tolerated procedure than EBUS-TBNA. Therefore, EUS-B-FNA can be the main procedure in a combined approach with EBUS-TBNA and EUS-B-FNA. In group A, the investigators perform EBUS-TBNA first and EUS-B-FNA is performed when necessary. In group B, EUS-B-FNA is first applied and EBUS-TBNA is performed when necessary. The hypothesis is that the diagnostic yield of the EUS centered procedure is as good as that of the EBUS centered procedure and the EUS centered procedure is more tolerable than the EBUS centered procedure. We evaluate diagnostic yields and performance characteristics of each group.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
June 2011
End Date
February 2012
Last Updated
13 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Histologically confirmed or strongly suspected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
  • Potentially operable patients

Exclusion Criteria

  • M1 disease
  • Inoperable T4 disease
  • Mediastinal infiltration or extranodal invasion of the mediastinal lymph node visible on chest CT.
  • Confirmed supraclavicular lymph node metastasis
  • Pancoast tumors
  • Medically inoperable patients
  • Contraindications for bronchoscopy and esophageal endoscopy
  • Drug reaction to lidocaine, midazolam,fentanyl
  • Pregnancy
  • Ground glass-dominant nodule ( \< 3cm)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Diagnostic accuracy

Time Frame: When the confimative disgnosis is available in all subjects (after surgery) ; 8-12 months

Secondary Outcomes

  • Procedure time(During and just after the procedure ; 5-60 minutes)
  • Cardiovascular measurement (change of blood pressure, changes of heart rate, number of patients with arrhythmia)(During the procedure; 0-60 minutes)
  • Degree of desaturation(During the procedure; 0-60minutes)
  • Discomfort by the procedure(After the procedure ; 2-3hr)
  • Number of participants with adverse Events (infection, bleeding requiring intervention, pneumothorax, or any complications requiring hospital admission)(During and after the procedure; 0-2 weeks)
  • Lymph node features(During and after the procedure; 0-2hrs)
  • Fentanyl/midazolam/lidocaine consumption(After the procedure ; 1-2 hrs)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials