跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04100941
NCT04100941Unknown不适用

Comparing the Diagnostic Efficacy of Different Suction Techniques for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy of Pancreatic Solid Lesions Using 25G Procore Needle: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicentric Clinical Study

Changhai Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 300 人开始时间: 2019年6月10日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
300
试验地点
1
主要终点
specificity of each individual technique

研究概览

简要总结

There are many factors that can affect the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA, including lesion factors, the endoscoist experience, the needle size, the number of needle passes, and the suction technique. since diagnostic efficacy of different suction techniques for EUS-FNB is still uncertain, thus we decided to compare the diagnostic efficacy of three common methods: the 10 ml standard negative pressure, slow pull and wet suction.

详细描述

the standard suction: after the needle is inserted in the mass, removing the stylet before performing EUS-FNA. Then attach a 10mL syringe to the end of needle. 20 times of for-backward Suction was applied after the lesion was punctured.

slow-pull : after the needle is inserted in the mass, slowly pull the stylet out while performing EUS-FNA with 20 times for-backward.

wet suction: after removing the stylet, the needle was flushed with 5mL of saline solution to replace the column of air with saline. A 10mL syringe was attached to the end of the needle. 20 times of for-backward Suction was applied after the lesion was punctured.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • age 18-75 years,male or female
  • diagnosis or suspection of solid pancreatic mass based on previous imaging examination (ultrasonography, CT or MRI)
  • lesion diameter larger than 1 cm
  • signed informed consent letter

排除标准

  • pregnant female
  • Pancreatic cystic lesions
  • Anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy cannot be suspended
  • unable or refuse to provide informed consent
  • Coagulopathy (platelet count < 50× 103/μL,international normalized ratio > 1.5)
  • Severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction that cannot tolerate intravenous anesthesia
  • with history of mental disease
  • other medical conditions that are not suitable for EUS-FNB

研究组 & 干预措施

standard suction

Experimental

This arm will include all the patients that will get an endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy done with the standard suction technique with 10ml negative pressure

干预措施: standard suction (Diagnostic Test)

slow pull

Experimental

This arm will include all the patients that will get an endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy done with the slow pull technique

干预措施: slow pull (Diagnostic Test)

wet suction

Experimental

This arm will include all the patients that will get an endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy done with the wet suction technique

干预措施: wet suction (Diagnostic Test)

结局指标

主要结局

specificity of each individual technique

时间窗: 1 year

The results are compared with the gold standard and calculated the specificity

diagnostic accuracy of each individual technique

时间窗: 1 year

The results are compared with the gold standard and calculated the accuracy

diagnostic sensitivity of each individual technique

时间窗: 1 year

The results are compared with the gold standard and calculated the sensitivity

次要结局

  • cellularity(1 year)
  • blood contamination(1 year)
  • adverse event rate of each individual technique(1 year)
  • adequacy of specimens obtained by each individual technique(1 year)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Zhaoshen Li

chief of the Gastroenterology

Changhai Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparing the Diagnostic Efficacy of Different... | 临床试验