Phase II Study of Oral Nafithromycin in CABP
- Conditions
- Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP)
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT02903836
- Lead Sponsor
- Wockhardt
- Brief Summary
Study to Determine the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Oral Nafithromycin Versus Oral Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) in Adults
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 231
Meet the clinical criteria for CABP based on following:
- Clinical symptoms (new or worsening)
- Vital sign abnormalities
- Laboratory abnormalities
- Radiographic evidence of CABP
- PORT score
-
Subjects with any of the following confirmed or suspected types of pneumonia:
- Aspiration pneumonia
- Hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP)
- Healthcare-associated bacterial pneumonia (HCAP)
- Ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP)
- Pneumonia that may be caused by pathogen(s) resistant to either study drug
-
Receipt of 1 or more dose(s) of a potentially effective systemic antibacterial treatment for treatment of the current CABP
-
Suspected or confirmed non-infectious causes of pulmonary infiltrates
-
Subjects requiring concomitant adjunctive or additional potentially-effective systemic antibacterial treatment for management of CABP
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- FACTORIAL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Moxifloxacin 400 mg Moxifloxacin 400 mg PO q24h for 7 days;subjects will also receive two nafithromycin placebo tablets PO q24h on Days 1 through Day 7 to maintain the blind Nafithromycin 800 mg 5 days Nafithromycin 800 mg 5 days PO q24h for 5 days; subjects will receive matching placebo, to maintain the blind Nafithromycin 800 mg 3 days Nafithromycin 800 mg 3 days PO q24h for 3 days; subjects will receive matching placebo , to maintain the blind
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical Response in the ITT Population Day 4 from start of drug administration The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical response (response, non-response, or indeterminate) at Day 4, tested in the ITT population. Clinical response was determined programmatically using the investigator's assessment of CABP symptoms entered into the eCRF. The severity of the subject CABP symptoms of dyspnea (shortness of breath), cough, production of purulent sputum, and pleuritic chest pain were evaluated on a 4-point scale (absent, mild, moderate, or severe) based upon the CABP Symptom Severity Guidance
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical Response in the Micro-ITT Population Day 4 from start of drug administration Clinical response (response, non-response, or indeterminate) at Day 4 was also tested in the micro-ITT population as a secondary efficacy endpoint. Clinical response was determined programmatically using the investigator's assessment of CABP symptoms entered into the eCRF. The severity of the subject CABP symptoms of dyspnea (shortness of breath), cough, production of purulent sputum, and pleuritic chest pain were evaluated on a 4-point scale (absent, mild, moderate, or severe) based upon the CABP Symptom Severity Guidance
Trial Locations
- Locations (6)
Health Concepts
🇺🇸Bedford, South Dakota, United States
A & L Clinical research
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
A Plus Research Inc.
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
Empire Clinical Research, LLC
🇺🇸Miami Lakes, Florida, United States
RM Medical Research, Inc.
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
HCI Metromedic Walkin Medical Center
🇺🇸Bedford, Massachusetts, United States