IRCT20180526039856N1
Recruiting
Phase 3
Comparison of the effect of mirror therapy and modified constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity motor function in stroke patients
niversity of social welfare and rehabilitation sciences0 sites42 target enrollmentTBD
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- stroke patients.
- Sponsor
- niversity of social welfare and rehabilitation sciences
- Enrollment
- 42
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 7 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Inclusion is voluntary (completed consent form)
- •Age range 75\-18 years
- •Ischemic or hemorrhage stroke diagnosed by neurologist
- •Stage 4, 5 and 6 Brunnstrom in proximal and distal of upper extremities
- •Sufficient cognitive ability to understand and execute verbal and practical commands (obtaining at least 22 score from the Mini\-Mental Status Examination)
- •Mild spasticity in all involved upper limb joints (Modified Ashworth Scale less than 3\)
- •Existence at least 20 degrees wrist extension and 10 degrees extension of the affected fingers
Exclusion Criteria
- •Use of mirror therapy and modified constraint\-induced movement therapy before intervention
- •Refer to other clinics and receive other upper limb rehabilitation services
- •Despite previous dementia, difficulty understanding given explanations and execute commands such as Wernicke aphasia, global aphasia, and any impairment of vision and hearing examinations by specialist
- •Presence of musculoskeletal damage, frozen shoulder joint and any other neurological and orthopedic disease based on examination of specialist who leads to motion impairment.
- •Excessive pain in the upper limb ( in this study the score more than 4 in the Visual Analog Scale to be regarded as pain))
- •Botox injections at least 3 months before the intervention
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
To compare the effect of movement in front of Mirror and Movement of affected hand on upper limb movement in paralytic patients.Health Condition 1: G819- Hemiplegia, unspecifiedCTRI/2019/02/017488Seema Sahu36
Not yet recruiting
Phase 1
A Comparison Of Effect Of Mirror Therapy Versus Shoulder Exercises In Chronic Shoulder PaiCTRI/2018/06/014399SDM College of Medical Science and Hospital
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Effect of Mirror box therapy along with whole body vibration machine in stroke patients.CTRI/2024/07/071705KAHER Institute Of Physiotherapy
Completed
Not Applicable
To study if mirror therapy in adjunct to conventional physiotherapy on pain, instability, joint mobility and proprioception in patients with post ACL reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled TrialCTRI/2022/03/040949MGM Institute of Physiotherapy30
Recruiting
Phase 2
Effect of mirror therapy associated with functional tasks in arm function after strokeIndividuals with hemiparesis after stroke with mildly or moderately Motor impairment of upper limb (Fugl-Meyer Arm > 30/66).C10.597.636A01.378.800E02.779.483RBR-83mmq5niversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina