CTRI/2018/04/013470尚未招募未知
To compare oropharyngeal leak pressure and ease of insertion between Ambu AuraGain, Proseal LMA, and I-gel in infants and pediatric patient posted for lower abdominal surgery
Dr RPGMC Kangra at Tanda0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •Children (both male and female).
- •Of age,between 1 to 10 years.
- •who are to undergo elective abdominal surgery of <4 hours duration.
- •With ASA class 1 and 2.
排除标准
- •Patient with expected difficult airway (including mouth opening <2 cm, Cervical spine disease, abnormality of neck and oral pathology or any visible abnormal airway deformity).
- •At risk of aspiration (full stomach patient).
- •ASA class 3 and 4.
- •With upper respiratory tract infection or with coagulopathy.
研究者
相似试验
尚未招募
4 期
Which of the devices (LMA Protector or I-Gel)can be used for better airway management in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological surgery?CTRI/2024/07/070526All India Institute of Medical Sciences Patna
尚未招募
4 期
Which among the airway devices—I-Gel®, Blockbuster®, and Baska Mask—provides better sealing pressure in elderly patients under general anesthesia?CTRI/2024/03/063693All India Institute of Medical Sciences ,Patna
招募中
不适用
Comparison of efficacy of supraglottic airway device in awake craniotomyJPRN-jRCT1012200027Chaki Tomohiro70
尚未招募
4 期
Whether LMA Protector is better than I Gel for airway management in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomyCTRI/2024/07/070136All India Institute of Medical Sciences , Patna
招募中
不适用
Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure between i-gel and LMA-Supreme in awake craniotomy: a randomized controlled trialbrain tumor and seizureJPRN-UMIN000043615Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine70