Comparison of efficacy of three types of laryngoscopes in adult patients posted for surgery
Phase 3
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K928- Other specified diseases of the digestive system
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/08/044684
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College AMU Aligarh
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
ASA Grade I &II patients.
Age between 20-70 years
Weight between 40-70 kgÃ?Â
Patients of both sexes
Patients planned for elective surgery
MP Grades I and II
Exclusion Criteria
Previous history of multiple/ failed intubation.
Predicted difficult laryngoscopy
Any pathology of the oral cavity that may obstruct the insertion of device
Mouth opening less than 2.5cm.
Potentially full stomach patients (trauma, morbid obesity, pregnancy, history of gastric regurgitation and heartburn) and at risk of esophageal reflux (hiatus hernia).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the number of attempts required for successful intubation. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 2 years
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To grade the ease of tracheal intubation using these devices. <br/ ><br>To compare the laryngoscopy and intubation time using the three intubating devices. <br/ ><br>To compare the number of adjustment maneuvers required for successful intubation each device. <br/ ><br>To look for any complications like trauma and sore throat during laryngoscopy and intubation. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 2 years