The Comparison between the effects of Two treatment of Postcerebrovascular Accident (CVA) Motor Aphasia
Phase 3
- Conditions
- Aphasia.Dysphasia and aphasia
- Registration Number
- IRCT2014052417814N1
- Lead Sponsor
- Vice Chancellor of Research, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 48
Inclusion Criteria
Right handedness; the diagnosis of stroke; at least one year passed since the stroke; speaking Persian; and at least a primary education; Exclusion criteria: Patients under speech therapy
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Response time. Timepoint: Before the study and after rTMS. Method of measurement: Quantity criteria.;The Number of Photos Names said by the patients. Timepoint: Before the study and after rTMS. Method of measurement: Quantity criteria.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie rTMS efficacy in post-CVA motor aphasia recovery?
How does rTMS compare to standard speech therapy for improving verbal fluency in CVA-induced motor aphasia patients?
Are there specific biomarkers that predict response to rTMS treatment in motor aphasia following cerebrovascular accident?
What adverse events are associated with rTMS protocols in phase III trials for post-CVA aphasia and how are they managed?
What combination therapies with rTMS show promise in enhancing outcomes for dysphasia and aphasia after stroke?