Three Different Cross-linking Protocols for Treatment of Pediatric Keratoconus
- Conditions
- Corneal Ectasia
- Interventions
- Procedure: Standard CXLProcedure: Transepithelial CXLProcedure: Accelerated CXL
- Registration Number
- NCT05691335
- Lead Sponsor
- Sohag University
- Brief Summary
comparison between standard cross-linking protocol and accelerated and transepithelial cross-linking
- Detailed Description
comparison between standard cross-linking protocol and accelerated and transepithelial cross-linking for treatment of documented pediatric keratoconus progression. The study patients are divided into 3 groups. Group A patient treated with standard cross-linking. Group B patients treated with accelerated cross-linking. Group C patients treated with transepithelial cross-linking.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 97
- pediatric patient less than 18 years old
- keratoconus stage I-III ABCD keratoconus grading system
- age more than 18 years
- previous eye surgery
- current eye infection or pathology
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Standard CXL Standard CXL Patients treated according to Dresden Protocol with epithelium-off CXL. Transepithelial CXL Transepithelial CXL Patients treated according to transepithelial Protocol with epithelium-on CXL. Accelerated CXL Accelerated CXL Patients treated according to accelerated Protocol with epithelium-off CXL.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Corrected distance visual acuity 36 months measured in logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR)
Sphere 36 months measured in diopters (D)
Uncorrected distance visual acuity 36 months measured in logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR)
Keratometry (Kmax) 36 months measured in diopters (D)
Cylinder 36 months measured in diopters (D)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Faculty of medicine
🇪🇬Sohag, Egypt