Single Blind, Randomized Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Convenience of Electronic Bidet With Very Low Force Flow Fountain System for Pain Control and Wound Healing After Operation for Anal Disease, Compared to Conventional Sitz Bath
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Hemorrhoid
- Sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Enrollment
- 76
- Primary Endpoint
- pain score
- Last Updated
- 5 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The investigator will perform a randomized clinical trials to compare the effect of pain management and wound healing after hemorrhoidectomy between warm sitz bath and electronic bidet.
Detailed Description
After hemorrhoidectomy, the patients should take warm sitz bath for relieving pain and inducing wound healing. Electronic bidet is a device for cleansing the anus after defecation, and some patients are using the bidet for sitz bath. Thus, the investigator perform this study for comparing the effect of pain and wound management after hemorrhoidectomy between sitz bath and electronic bidet
Investigators
Kyu Joo Park
Professor
Seoul National University Hospital
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •the patients who undergo hemorrhoidectomy
Exclusion Criteria
- •previous history of anal surgery
- •Crohn's anal disease
- •perianal complex abscess or fistula
- •uncontrollable medical disease
- •malignancy
- •immunocompromised
- •pregnancy
- •breast feeding
- •NSAID allergy
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
pain score
Time Frame: 1 week
visual analog scale after hemorrhoidectomy at 1 week
Secondary Outcomes
- wound healing(4 week)
- convenience(4 week)
- urinary difficulty(4 week)