MedPath

GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy in Patients With Reduced Mouth Opening

Completed
Conditions
Videolaryngoscopy
Small Mouth
Intubation;Difficult
Registration Number
NCT04174833
Lead Sponsor
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Brief Summary

This study aims to evaluate the clinical performance, quality of larynx visualization and difficulty of videolaryngoscopic intubation in patients with a reduced mouth opening (1.0 to 3.0 cm) utilizing the latest generation of GlideScopeTM Spectrum low profile laryngoscopy system.

Detailed Description

Reduced mouth opening in adults has been proven an important risk factor for difficult endotracheal intubation utilizing both direct and indirect laryngoscopy techniques, and a major reason for anesthesia-related adverse events. Over the past two decades, videolaryngoscopy has evolved to be the primary indirect laryngoscopy technique in a difficult endotracheal intubation setting. The possibility for optimal visualization of the laryngeal structures renders this method particularly helpful in patients with limited mouth opening. Especially videolaryngoscopy with acute-angle blades has been proposed to be favorable over conventional direct laryngoscopy in this setting. However, previous research has shown that a mouth opening of approximately 2.0 - 3.0 cm represents an independent risk factor and a possible critical lower limit for safe videolaryngoscopic intubation.

The latest generation of GlideScopeTM Spectrum blades may provide sufficient intubation conditions even in patients with a maximum mouth opening below 3.0 cm.

Our research group aims to evaluate the clinical performance, quality of larynx visualization and severity of videolaryngoscopic intubation the GlideScopeTM Spectrum system in patients with a small mouth opening.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients scheduled for non-cardiac surgery
  • Required general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation
  • Mouth opening between 1.0 and 3.0 cm (any reason) recognized during preoperative assessment
  • Written consent provided
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Confirmed indication for awake fiberoptic intubation, especially due to enoral and pharyngeal tumors, abscesses or other obstructive lesions
  • Endotracheal intubation planned without deep general anesthesia or without neuromuscular blockade (e.g. awake videolaryngoscopy)
  • Qualification for rapid sequence anesthesia induction due to risk of pulmonary aspiration
  • Loose teeth

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Successful videolaryngoscopic endotracheal intubation rateWithin 1 hour after anesthesia induction

Observation during airway management

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Intubation timeWithin 1 hour after anesthesia induction

Observation during airway management

Number of attemptsWithin 1 hour after anesthesia induction

Observation during airway management

First pass success rateWithin 1 hour after anesthesia induction

Observation during airway management

Best view obtainedWithin 1 hour after concluded endotracheal intubation

Cormack-Lehane classification

Endotracheal intubation difficultyWithin 1 hour after concluded endotracheal intubation

Subjective rating on a numeric rating scale \[0-100\]; 0 - very easy; 100 - very difficult

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf

🇩🇪

Hamburg, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath