Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01860417
NCT01860417
Completed
Phase 1

Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease With Allogenic Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSV*) *MSV: Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Expanded Using the Valladolid IBGM Procedure

Red de Terapia Celular2 sites in 1 country24 target enrollmentJune 21, 2013

Overview

Phase
Phase 1
Intervention
Allogenic Mesenchymal Stromal Cells
Conditions
Degenerative Disc Disease
Sponsor
Red de Terapia Celular
Enrollment
24
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Pain and Disability Evaluation
Status
Completed
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

In this study we want to evaluate the clinical use of allogenic mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), obtained from bone marrow of healthy donors, for treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD). The trial is based in previous results with autologous MSC (Orozco et al., Transplantation 92: 822-828; 2011). Here we propose a phase I-II trial, prospective, randomized, blinded, and controlled for the treatment DDD using MSV, a Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-compliant expanded bone marrow MSC (MSV, Investigational medicinal product Num. 10-134). The assay consists of two arms with 12 patients each one. Patients in the experimental arm will be given a single intra-discal transplantation of MSV (25 millions in 2 ml). Control patients will be infiltrated in the paravertebral muscles close to the lesion with 2 ml of 1% mepivacain. We shall follow the evolution of pain, disability and quality of life as well as disc fluid content by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (T2-calibrated).

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
June 21, 2013
End Date
December 15, 2015
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Degenerative disease of one or two lumbar discs with predominant back pain after conservative treatment (physical and medical) for over 6 months.
  • Fibrous ring capable of holding the cell implantation, demonstrated by Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image (stages 2, 3 and 4 of Adams).
  • Decrease of disc height of more than 20% (radiographic measurement in side image).
  • Absence of spinal infection.
  • Haematological and biochemical analysis wit no significant alterations that contraindicates intervention.
  • The patient is able to understand the nature of the study.
  • Informed written consent of the patient.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Age over 75 or under 18 or legally dependent
  • Allergy to gentamicin, or to bovine, cattle or horse serum.
  • Congenital or acquired diseases leading to spine deformations that may upset cell application.
  • Spinal segmental instability, spinal canal stenosis, isthmus pathology and other conditions that may compromise the study
  • Modic III changes on MRI images (31).
  • Overweight with body mass index (mass in Kg/size in m2) greater than 35 (obesity grade II).
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • Neoplasia
  • Immunosuppression
  • Participation in another clinical trial or treatment with another investigational product within 30 days prior to inclusion in the study.

Arms & Interventions

Allogenic Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) prepared from bone marrow from healthy donor expanded ex vivo for 3-4 weeks. Intradiscal injection of 25 millions MSC in 2 ml of saline

Intervention: Allogenic Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

Mepivacaine

Infiltration of paravertebral musculature close to the affected disc(s) with 2 ml of 1% Mepivacaine

Intervention: Mepivacaine

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Pain and Disability Evaluation

Time Frame: Change since the baseline (before intervention) up to the end of the follow-up period, 12 months after the intervention

Change in the composite variable, which includes pain and disability 1 year after intervention, was plotted as a function of the initial pain score or disability index. Results for the relief of lumbar pain and Oswestry disability index were all included for both, control and cell-treated patients. The scores obtained from this analysis (slope of the plot) range from 0 to 1, with higher scores meaning a better outcome.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Oswestry Disability Index at 3 Months(At 3 months after the intervention)
  • Oswestry Disability Index at 12 Months(At 12 months after the intervention)
  • SF-12 Physical Component at 6 Months(6 months after the intervention)
  • Evaluation of Affected Disc(s) by Quantitative MRI Ratio 12/6months(At 12 months from 6 months after the intervention)
  • Visual Analogue Scale at 12 Months(At 12 months after the intervention)
  • SF-12 Physical Component at 12 Months(12 months after the intervention)
  • Evaluation of Affected Disc(s) by Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (RMI): Density at 12 Months(At 12 months after the intervention)
  • SF-12 Physical Component at 3 Months(3 months after the intervention)
  • Visual Analogue Scale at 3 Months(At 3 months after the intervention)
  • Visual Analogue Scale at 6 Months(At 6 months after the intervention)
  • Oswestry Disability Index at 6 Months(At 6 months after the intervention)
  • SF-12 Mental Component at 3 Months(3 months after the intervention)
  • SF-12 Mental Component at 6 Months(6 months after the intervention)
  • Pfirrmann Stage at 12 Months(At 12 months after the intervention)
  • Evaluation of Affected Disc(s) by Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (RMI): Density at 6 Months(At 6 months after the intervention)
  • SF-12 Mental Component at 12 Months(12 months after the intervention)
  • Pfirrmann Stage at 6 Months(At 6 months after the intervention)

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials