跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01156623
NCT01156623已完成不适用

Value of EBUS-TBNA for Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in a Tuberculosis-endemic Country

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 36 人开始时间: 2010年6月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
36
试验地点
2
主要终点
Diagnostic accuracy

研究概览

简要总结

In lung cancer with enlarged or non-enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and Positron emission tomography (PET) scan frequently show discrepancy in tuberculosis-endemic area. Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) with ability of real-time nodal sampling possibly improves the nodal diagnosis.

The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of nodal diagnosis of contrast-enhanced CT and PET scan with and without EBUS-TBNA, this study will be performed.

详细描述

Lung cancer remains a fatal disease worldwide, and surgical treatment offers possibility for long-term survival. However, the indication and outcome of surgical resection depends on the pre-operative accurate staging and extent of intra-operative lymph node dissection. Therefore, the accurate lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is crucial for planning optimal treatment. Traditionally, the conventional contrast-enhanced CT essentially identifies enlarged lymph node greater than 1cm as nodal metastasis. Nevertheless, with moderate sensitivity and specificity, contrast-enhanced CT carries substantial risk to under-stage small nodal metastasis and to over-stage inflammatory lymphadenitis.

Positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) provides functional images of tumor metabolism, and has been used as a non-invasive alternative other than contrast-enhanced CT for nodal staging in NSCLC. In the absence of detectable lymph node enlargement by CT, FDG-PET scan were increasingly used to stage the lymph node status for NSCLC in some part of world. Hence, the accuracy of FDG-PET might substantially alter the treatment strategy in an institution where the mediastinoscopy is unavailable for lymph node sampling. However, it is generally agreed that abnormal FDG uptake occurred frequently in granulomatous and inflammatory disease. In an endemic area where tuberculosis is still prevalent; such as Eastern Asia, FDG-PET scan has reportedly shown reduced sensitivity and positive predictive value in nodal staging of NSCLC. Thereby, FDG-PET scan alone does not appear to replace mediastinoscopy for nodal staging of NSCLC in a tuberculosis-endemic area, especially in potentially operable patients without enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes.

The recent development of curved ultrasound probe-equipped bronchoscope, which enables direct and real-time aspiration by endobronchial ultrasound- transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes, has become an less invasive alternative for nodal staging other than mediastinoscopy. By direct nodal sampling, EBUS-TBNA improves lymph node staging from an image basis to a cytology basis; or even, pathology basis. However, the variable sensitivity and negative predictive value of EBUS-TBNA has been reported, especially in lymph node reduced in size after induction chemotherapy. Nevertheless, reports from NSCLC without significant mediastinal lymph node enlargement on CT otherwise suggested EBUS-TBNA exhibited a high sensitivity and specificity for detecting small nodal metastasis. Therefore, whether EBUS-TBNA retains the reportedly high performance of nodal staging in lung cancer patients without enlarged mediastinal lymph node on CT in a TB endemic country; a condition of FDG-PET scan reportedly showed increased false-positive rate, is still unclear.

In present study, we primarily aim at the comparison of accuracy of nodal diagnosis of contrast-enhanced CT and PET scan with and without EBUS-TBNA in a condition of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes of lung cancer. Secondarily, we aim at the accuracy of nodal diagnosis by FDG-PET scan in the same condition, and investigate the characteristics of lymph nodes with false PET result.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Completed whole body CT or PET scan.

排除标准

  • Pregnancy,
  • Age less than 20 years old,
  • Other malignancy.

研究组 & 干预措施

Without EBUS-TBNA group

No Intervention

The patients enrolled in present study are those with non-small lung cancer and receive contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and Positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) examination. In this group, no EBUS-TBNA will be arranged if patients refused it despite we advised it.

With EBUS-TBNA group

Experimental

The patients enrolled in present study are those with non-small lung cancer and receive contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and Positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) examination. In this group, further EBUS-TBNA will be arranged if patients agreed it.

干预措施: EBUS-TBNA (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Diagnostic accuracy

时间窗: 2 weeks

The results of each diagnostic modality were compared with the surgical pathology obtained by thoracotomy and lymph node dissection. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of each diagnostic modality were calculated as the standard definition.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Chung Fu-Tsai

Attending physician

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Endobronchial Ultrasound Guided Transbronchial... | 临床试验