NCT01483417UnknownPhase 3
Multi-institution, Randomized Trial for Efficacy and Safety of Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Uterine Myoma or Adenomyosis
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Sponsor
- Samsung Medical Center
- Enrollment
- 240
- Locations
- 9
- Primary Endpoint
- Conversion rate
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Multi-center prospective randomized trial of single port laparoscopic surgery (SILS) versus conventional 3-4 ports laparoscopic hysterectomy. Hypothesis is that conversion rate of SILS is not inferior to that of conventional approach.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 20 Years to 60 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- Female
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Symptomatic (dysmenorrhea, palpable mass, pelvic pain or discomfort urinary symptom, increasing size, menorrhagia) myomas or adenomyomas
- •Uterine size < gestational age of 14 weeks
- •Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- •Medical diseases such as heart failure, renal insufficiency, liver cirrhosis, pancreatitis, uncontrolled DM
- •Huge uterine size > gestational age of 14 weeks
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Conversion rate
Time Frame: 1 week
Conversion means that events required additional port(s) or open laparotomy
Secondary Outcomes
- Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)(12 weeks)
- Postoperative pain(postop. 1 day, 1 week)
Investigators
Tae-Joong Kim
Clinical Assistant Professor
Samsung Medical Center
Study Sites (9)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Approved For Marketing
Not Applicable
Multicenter Single-port Colectomy RCTColon NeoplasmsNCT01480128The Catholic University of Korea
Completed
Phase 4
Prospective Randomized Study of SILS Versus CLS for Rectal CancerRectal CancerAdenocarcinomaNCT01579721Hvidovre University Hospital40
Unknown
Phase 3
Short-term Outcomes of SILS+1 Versus CLS for Distal Gastric CancerSurgeryNCT05035446Fujian Cancer Hospital120
Completed
Not Applicable
Single Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomyAcute AppendicitisNCT01424631Mansoura University2
Unknown
Not Applicable
A Prospective Study Comparing Telescopic vs. Balloon Dissection in Single Incision Laparoscopic Inguinal Herniorraphy (SILTELESCOPIC)Inguinal HerniaNCT01883115The Sydney Hernia Specialists Clinic102
