Comparison Of Outcomes After Knee Arthroplasty Using Posterior-Substituting Versus Cruciate-Retaining Prostheses
- Conditions
- Total Knee Arthroplasty
- Interventions
- Procedure: posterior cruciate ligament-substituting prosthesesProcedure: posterior cruciate ligament-retaining prostheses
- Registration Number
- NCT06170931
- Lead Sponsor
- Bezmialem Vakif University
- Brief Summary
Total knee replacement is used in the treatment of patients with knee arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and other knee disorders. Today, there are basically two designs; It cuts the posterior cruciate ligament (PS) and protects the posterior cruciate ligament (CR). Although there is no clear study suggesting which design is better, research on this subject has increased recently. the investigators aim is to define the superiority of these two designs over each other. Preoperative and postoperative joint range of motion examinations were performed on both knees separately. WOMAC and OXFORD scores were examined separately for both knees.
- Detailed Description
Total knee arthroplasty is used to treat patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and other knee disorders. Today, there are basically two primary designs; posterior cruciate Substituting (PS) and protects the posterior cruciate -Retaining (CR). However, it is still controversial which approach is good, as both CR and PS have advantages and disadvantages. Proponents of the posterior cruciate retaining system argue that it provides natural stability, wider joint range of motion, better proprioception, and better knee kinematics. In addition, proponents of the posterior cruciate substituting system argue that it provides more harmonious articulation and a wider flexion range.
As a result, although there is no clear study suggesting which design is better, research on this subject has increased recently. Our aim is to define the superiority of these two designs over each other.
Patients with the same stage of knee osteoarthritis in both knees were selected. Total knee arthroplasty was performed in the same session by making the appropriate design for the appropriate knee simultaneously. Preoperative and postoperative joint range of motion examinations were performed on both knees separately. WOMAC and OXFORD scores were examined separately for both knees.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 24
- Patients with primary osteoarthritis of both knees
- Patients with secondary osteoarthritis of both knees
- Patients with primary osteoarthritis in both knees and undergoing unilateral knee prosthesis
- Patients with secondary osteoarthritis in both knees and who underwent unilateral knee prosthesis
- Patients with primary osteoarthritis in both knees and who underwent bilateral knee prosthesis in different sessions
- Patients with secondary osteoarthritis in both knees and who underwent bilateral knee prosthetics in different sessions.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description The other knee of a patient with osteoarthritis in both knees posterior cruciate ligament-substituting prostheses Posterior cruciate ligament transection approach in patients with knee osteoarthritis A knee of a patient with osteoarthritis of both knees posterior cruciate ligament-retaining prostheses Posterior cruciate ligament protective approach in patients with knee osteoarthritis
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Range of motions 3 year Preoperative and postoperative knee flexion and extension degrees of the patients were measured.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method WOMAC Score (Score from 0 to 100) 3 year Preoperative and postoperative WOMAC score of the patients were examined.
OXFORD Knee Score(Score from 0 to 60) 3 year Preoperative and postoperative OXFORD score of the patients were examined.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Bezmialem Vakıf University
🇹🇷Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey